Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182568›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Evidence for distinct biodevelopmental influences on male sexual orientation.

Ashlyn Swift-Gallant, Lindsay A Coome, Madison Aitken, D Ashley Monks, Doug P VanderLaan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Male androphilia, fraternal birth order, and female fecundity in Samoa: A 10-y retrospective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sexual partner preference in animals and humans.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashlyn Swift-GallantDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3X9, Canada; aswiftgallant@mun.ca doug.vanderlaan@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7224-2672
Lindsay A CoomeDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.
Madison AitkenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-5462
D Ashley MonksDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.
Doug P VanderLaanDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada; aswiftgallant@mun.ca doug.vanderlaan@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several biological mechanisms have been proposed to influence male sexual orientation, but the extent to which these mechanisms cooccur is unclear. Putative markers of biological processes are often used to evaluate the biological basis of male sexual orientation, including fraternal birth order, handedness, and familiality of same-sex sexual orientation; these biomarkers are proxies for immunological, endocrine, and genetic mechanisms. Here, we used latent profile analysis (LPA) to assess whether these biomarkers cluster within the same individuals or are present in different subgroups of nonheterosexual men. LPA defined four profiles of men based on these biomarkers: 1) A subgroup who did not have these biomarkers, 2) fraternal birth order, 3) handedness, and 4) familiality. While the majority of both heterosexual and nonheterosexual men were grouped in the profile that did not have any biomarker, the three profiles associated with a biomarker were composed primarily of nonheterosexual men. We then evaluated whether these subgroups differed on measures of gender nonconformity and personality that reliably show male sexual orientation differences. The subgroup without biomarkers was the most gender-conforming whereas the fraternal birth order subgroup was the most female-typical and agreeable, compared with the other profiles. Together, these findings suggest there are multiple distinct biodevelopmental pathways influencing same-sex sexual orientation in men.

Indexed as

Personality DevelopmentBirth OrderFunctional LateralityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologySexual BehaviorSexual Developmentfamilialityfraternal birth orderhandednesslatent profile analysismale sexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID31182568
PMCPMC6600923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.