Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182543›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2019

Kyle Emerick, Pamela C Ronald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Promise of Synthetic Biology for Redesigning Plant Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Needs and opportunities to future-proof crops and the use of crop systems to mitigate atmospheric change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Agronomic potential of plant-specific Gγ proteins.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Seven plant capacities to adapt to abiotic stress.Journal of experimental botany · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Revisions to USDA biotechnology regulations: The SECURE rule.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle EmerickDepartment of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155-6722.
Pamela C RonaldDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Genome Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By the year 2100, the number of people on Earth is expected to increase by ∼50%, placing increasing demands on food production in a time when a changing climate is predicted to compromise crop yields. Feeding this future world requires scientifically informed innovations in agriculture. Here, we describe how a rice gene conferring tolerance to prolonged submergence has helped farmers in South and Southeast Asia mitigate rice crop failure during floods. We discuss how planting of this new variety benefited socially disadvantaged groups. This example indicates that investment in agricultural improvement can protect farmers from risks associated with a changing climate.

Indexed as

Climate ChangePlants, Genetically ModifiedAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgricultureAsiaGenes, PlantOryza

Identifiers

PMID31182543
PMCPMC6886445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.