Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182499›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2019

Regulating, Measuring, and Modeling the Viscoelasticity of Bacterial Biofilms

Samuel G V Charlton, Michael A White, Saikat Jana, Lucy E Eland, Pahala Gedara Jayathilake, J Grant Burgess, Jinju Chen, Anil Wipat, Thomas P Curtis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Coacervate Dense Phase Displaces Surface-EstablishedJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. An electrogenetic toggle switch model.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Probing the growth and mechanical properties ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The structural role of bacterial eDNA in the formation of biofilm streamers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel G V CharltonSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Michael A WhiteInterdisciplinary Computing & Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Saikat JanaSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Saikat.Jana@newcastle.ac.uk.
Lucy E ElandInterdisciplinary Computing & Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Pahala Gedara JayathilakeSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Grant BurgessSchool of Natural & Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jinju ChenSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anil WipatInterdisciplinary Computing & Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Thomas P CurtisSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms occur in a broad range of environments under heterogeneous physicochemical conditions, such as in bioremediation plants, on surfaces of biomedical implants, and in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. In these scenarios, biofilms are subjected to shear forces, but the mechanical integrity of these aggregates often prevents their disruption or dispersal. Biofilms' physical robustness is the result of the multiple biopolymers secreted by constituent microbial cells which are also responsible for numerous biological functions. A better understanding of the role of these biopolymers and their response to dynamic forces is therefore crucial for understanding the interplay between biofilm structure and function. In this paper, we review experimental techniques in rheology, which help quantify the viscoelasticity of biofilms, and modeling approaches from soft matter physics that can assist our understanding of the rheological properties. We describe how these methods could be combined with synthetic biology approaches to control and investigate the effects of secreted polymers on the physical properties of biofilms. We argue that without an integrated approach of the three disciplines, the links between genetics, composition, and interaction of matrix biopolymers and the viscoelastic properties of biofilms will be much harder to uncover.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsBiomechanical PhenomenaGene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31182499
PMCPMC6707926
OpenAlexW2951666776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.