ArticleGenetics2019
Construction of Genetic Linkage Maps in Multiparental Populations.
Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- MAGIC populations: a next-generation framework for dissecting complex quantitative traits and accelerating molecular breeding in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- A high-density linkage map reveals broad- and fine-scale sex differences in recombination in the hihi (stitchbird; Notiomystis cincta).Heredity · 2024Article
- Whole genome resequencing and phenotyping of MAGIC population for high resolution mapping of drought tolerance in chickpea.The plant genome · 2024Article
- A Wheat 660 K SNP array-based high-density genetic map facilitates QTL mapping of flag leaf-related traits in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- SeSAM: software for automatic construction of order-robust linkage maps.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Whole-genome sequence and methylome profiling of the almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb] cultivar 'Nonpareil'.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- There and back again; historical perspective and future directions forHorticulture research · 2022Article
- An IBD-based mixed model approach for QTL mapping in multiparental populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Genetic architecture of individual variation in recombination rate on the X chromosome in cattle.Heredity · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Construction of genetic linkage maps has become a routine step for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL), particularly in animal and plant breeding populations. Many multiparental populations have recently been produced to increase genetic diversity and QTL mapping resolution. However, few software packages are available for map construction in these populations. In this paper, we build a general framework for the construction of genetic linkage maps from genotypic data in diploid populations, including bi- and multiparental populations, cross-pollinated (CP) populations, and breeding pedigrees. The framework is implemented as an automatic pipeline called magicMap, where the maximum multilocus likelihood approach utilizes genotypic information efficiently. We evaluate magicMap by extensive simulations and eight real datasets: one biparental, one CP, four multiparent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC), and two nested association mapping (NAM) populations, the number of markers ranging from a few hundred to tens of thousands. Not only is magicMap the only software capable of accommodating all of these designs, it is more accurate and robust to missing genotypes and genotyping errors than commonly used packages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.