Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182164›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2019

Impact of an innovative tuberculosis financing and payment model on health service utilization by tuberculosis patients in China: do the poor fare better than the rich?

Di Dong, Wei-Xi Jiang, Qian Long, Fei Huang, Hui Zhang, Jia-Ying Chen, Li Xiang, Qiang Li, Sheng-Lan Tang, Henry Lucas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Elderly Individuals with Tuberculosis: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Di DongGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Wei-Xi JiangGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Qian LongGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Fei HuangNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing, China.
Hui ZhangNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing, China. zhanghui@chinacdc.cn.
Jia-Ying ChenSchool of Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Li XiangTongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qiang LiSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Sheng-Lan TangDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. shenglan.tang@duke.edu.
Henry LucasInstitute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 51914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) prevalence is closely associated with poverty in China, and poor patients face more barriers to treatment. Using an insurance-based approach, the China-Gates TB program Phase II was implemented between 2012 and 2014 in three cities in China to improve access to TB care and reduce the financial burden on patients, particularly among the poor. This study aims to assess the program effects on service use, and its equity impact across different income groups.

methodsData from 788 and 775 patients at baseline and final evaluation were available for analysis respectively. Inpatient and outpatient service utilization, treatment adherence, and patient satisfaction were assessed before and after the program, across different income groups (extreme poverty, moderate poverty and non-poverty), and in various program cities, using descriptive statistics and multi-variate regression models. Key stakeholder interviews were conducted to qualitatively evaluate program implementation and impacts.

resultsAfter program implementation, the hospital admission rate increased more for the extreme poverty group (48.5 to 70.7%) and moderate poverty group (45.0 to 68.1%), compared to the non-poverty group (52.9 to 64.3%). The largest increase in the number of outpatient visits was also for the extreme poverty group (4.6 to 5.7). The proportion of patients with good medication adherence increased by 15 percentage points in the extreme poverty group and by ten percentage points in the other groups. Satisfaction rates were high in all groups. Qualitative feedback from stakeholders also suggested that increased reimbursement rates, easier reimbursement procedures, and allowance improved patients' service utilization. Implementation of case-based payment made service provision more compliant to clinical pathways.

conclusionPatients in extreme or moderate poverty benefited more from the program compared to a non-poverty group, indicating improved equity in TB service access. The pro-poor design of the program provides important lessons to other TB programs in China and other countries to better address TB care for the poor.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementLogistic ModelsMaleMedication AdherenceAntitubercular AgentsCase-based paymentFinancing and payment modelHealth service useTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31182164
PMCPMC6558905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.