Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182162›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2019

Sex, gut microbiome, and cardiovascular disease risk.

Alexander C Razavi, Kaitlin S Potts, Tanika N Kelly, Lydia A Bazzano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Gut microbial alterations and functional shifts in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: insights from a northwestern Chinese metagenomic study.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. mSphere · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander C RazaviDepartment of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Kaitlin S PottsDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Tanika N KellyDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Lydia A BazzanoDepartment of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. lbazzano@tulane.edu.
Tulane University · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI TERRY C DAVIS · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Tulane COBRE in Cardiometabolic Diseases Clinical Research CoreP20GM109036 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI JING CHEN · 2016 to 2026
$25.3M
Childhood CV Risk and Adult CVD Outcomes: an International Long-term Follow-upR01HL121230 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI BURNS, TRUDY L, CHEN, WEI · 2015 to 2019
$13.3M
Tulane Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH)K12HD043451 · NICHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI KROUSEL-WOOD, MARIE · 2002 to 2023
$9.9M
Obesity Genes, Energy Regulation in Response to Weight-Loss DietsR01DK091718 · NIDDK · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI QI, LU · 2012 to 2021
$4.5M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)TL1TR001418 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
Digital biomarkers of Alzheimers-related brain health and functionR21AG057983 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI BAZZANO, LYDIA, URBINA, ELAINE MOTT · 2018 to 2020
$812k
The Roles of the Microbiome and Metabolome in Vascular AgingR21AG051914 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI KELLY, TANIKA NICOLE · 2016 to 2017
$424k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001418NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121230NIA NIH HHS R21 AG051914NIA NIH HHS R21 AG057983NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043451NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091718NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109036NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key differences exist between men and women in the determinants and manifestations of cardiovascular and cardiometabolic diseases. Recently, gut microbiome-host relations have been implicated in cardiovascular disease and associated metabolic conditions; therefore, gut microbiota may be key mediators or modulators driving the observed sexual dimorphism in disease onset and progression. While current evidence regarding pure physiological sex differences in gut microbiome composition is modest, robust research suggests that gut microbiome-dependent metabolites may interact with important biological pathways under sex hormone control, including toll-like receptor and flavin monooxygenase signaling. Here, we review key sex differences in gut microbiome interactions with four primary determinants of cardiovascular disease, impaired glucose regulation, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity. Through this process, we propose important sex differences in downstream metabolic pathways that may be at the interface of the gut microbiome and cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesDietFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsBlood pressureCardiovascular diseasesGut microbiomeInsulinLipidsObesitySex differenceTMAO

Identifiers

PMID31182162
PMCPMC6558780
OpenAlexW2952704508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.