Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182123›Full record

Trial reportTrials2019

Understanding the impact of a multispecialty electronic consultation service on family physician referral rates to specialists: a randomized controlled trial using health administrative data.

Clare Liddy, Isabella Moroz, Erin Keely, Monica Taljaard, Catherine Deri Armstrong, Amir Afkham, Claire E Kendall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02053467 (Building Capacity for Specialized Services Through eConsultation), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02053467 nacompletednot on this map

Building Capacity for Specialized Services Through eConsultation

TypeinterventionalSponsorBruyère Health Research Institute.Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled113ConditionsHealth Services ResearchArmsChamplain BASE eConsult Service
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Utility of eConsults for COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Access to orthopedic specialist service in Ontario via eConsult.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clare LiddyC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St. Annex E, Room 106, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada. cliddy@bruyere.org.
Isabella MorozC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St. Annex E, Room 106, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada.
Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Catherine Deri ArmstrongDepartment of Economics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Amir AfkhamChamplain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Claire E KendallC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St. Annex E, Room 106, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada.

Funding

INSPRE-PHC Health Services Research Fund 06547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic consultation (eConsult) services are secure online applications facilitating provider-to-provider communication. They have been found to improve access to specialist care. However, little is known about eConsult's impact on family physicians' referral rates to specialty care. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a multispecialty eConsult service on referral rates from primary care.

methodsIn this parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial, we recruited primary care providers across Ontario not previously enrolled with eConsult. We randomly assigned participants to intervention and control arms. Participants in the intervention arm received access to eConsult for a period of 1 year while those in the control arm received no access to eConsult. The main outcome was specialist referral rate, expressed as the total number of referrals to (1) specialties available through eConsult, and (2) all medical specialties, per 100 patients seen. Multivariable negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention before and after adjusting for provider characteristics, using health administrative data.

resultsOne hundred and thirteen participants were randomized (56 to control and 57 to intervention). For the primary outcome (referrals to eConsult specialties), the results show a statistically significant reduction in the number of referrals in both arms (control-arm Rate Ratio (RR), 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91; intervention-arm RR, 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.85; unadjusted and adjusted RR values almost identical), as compared to the baseline data collected during the 12-month period before randomization, with a non-statistically significant 6% greater reduction in referrals in the intervention arm, compared to the control arm (unadjusted RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; adjusted RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03).

conclusionsOur randomized controlled trial of a multispecialty eConsult service demonstrated inconclusive results in terms of the impact of eConsult on physician referral rates. Findings are discussed in light of important limitations associated with conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of complex interventions in the primary care context with intent to inform the design and analysis of future trials.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT02053467 . Registered prospectively on 3 February 2014.

Indexed as

Remote ConsultationAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicineMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAccess to careHealth systemsPrimary careSpecialist referralWait times

Identifiers

PMID31182123
PMCPMC6558850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.