Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182066›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2019

Learning disability nurse provision in children's hospitals: hospital staff perceptions of whether it makes a difference.

Kate Oulton, Jo Wray, Angela Hassiotis, Charlotte Kenten, Jessica Russell, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Mark Whiting, Faith Gibson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of training to improve communication with disabled children on the ward: A feasibility study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kate OultonCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, England. Kate.oulton@gosh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-3849
Jo WrayCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, England.
Angela HassiotisUCL Division of Psychiatry, London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, England.
Charlotte KentenCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, England.
Jessica RussellCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, England.
Irene Tuffrey-WijneFaculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Cranmer Terrace, Kingston University & St George's, University of London, 6th floor Hunter Wing, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Mark WhitingHealth Research Building, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, England.
Faith GibsonCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, England.
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/21/45Department of Health RP-DG-0611-10003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to multiple United Kingdom investigations and inquiries into the care of adults with learning disabilities, Mencap produced the Getting it Right Charter which campaigned for the appointment of a Learning Disability Liaison Nurse in every hospital. More recent best practice guidelines from the Care Quality Commission included the need for all children's units to have access to a senior learning disability nurse who can support staff and help them manage difficult situations. However, little evidence exists of the extent of learning disability nurse provision in children's hospitals or the nature and impact of this role. Here we report selected findings from a national mixed methods study of hospital care for children and young people with and without learning disabilities in England. The extent of learning disability nurse provision in children's hospitals is described and perceptions of staff working in hospitals with and without such provision is compared.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with senior staff across 15 children's hospitals and an anonymous survey was sent to clinical and non-clinical staff with patient (children and young people) contact within these hospitals. The survey focused on six different elements of care for those with and without learning disability, with additional questions concerning identifying and tracking those with learning disabilities and two open-ended questions.

resultsForty-eight senior staff took part in interviews, which included a subset of nine nurses and one allied health professional employed in a dedicted learning disability nurse role, or similar. Surveys were completed by 1681, of whom 752 worked in a hospital with dedicated learning disability nurse provision. We found evidence of limited and varied learning disability nurse provision which was valued by hospital staff and shown to positively impact their perceptions of being capable to care for children and young people with learning disabilities, but not shown to increase staff perceptions of capacity or confidence, or how children and young people are valued within the hospital, their safety or access to appointments.

conclusionFurther consideration must be given to how learning disability nurse roles within children's hospitals are best operationalised in practice to have the greatest impact on staff and families, as well as how we monitor and evaluate them to ensure they are being utilised effectively and efficiently.

trial registrationThe study has been registered on the NIHR CRN portfolio 20,461 (Phase 1), 31,336 (Phases 2-4).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHospitals, PediatricNurse's RoleAdolescentChildData AnalysisEnglandHumansInterviews as TopicLearning DisabilitiesPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingQualitative ResearchSocial Determinants of HealthYoung AdultHealth services researchIntellectual disabilityLearning disability nurse provisionMixed methodsWorkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID31182066
PMCPMC6558867
OpenAlexW2949207843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.