Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182058›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Recovery for all in the community; position paper on principles and key elements of community-based mental health care.

René Keet, Marjonneke de Vetten-Mc Mahon, Laura Shields-Zeeman, Torleif Ruud, Jaap van Weeghel, Michiel Bahler, Cornelis L Mulder, Catherine van Zelst, Billy Murphy, Koen Westen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

René KeetGGZ NHN, Stationsplein 138, Heerhugowaard, The Netherlands. r.keet@ggz-nhn.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-6032
Marjonneke de Vetten-Mc MahonDepartment Trimbos International, Trimbos Institute, Da Costakade 45, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura Shields-ZeemanDepartment Trimbos International, Trimbos Institute, Da Costakade 45, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Torleif RuudClinical of Health Services Research and Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Jaap van WeeghelKenniscentrum Phrenos, Da Costakade 45, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michiel BahlerGGZ NHN, Stationsplein 138, Heerhugowaard, The Netherlands.
Cornelis L MulderDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Catherine van ZelstDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Billy MurphyInspire Mental Health, 10-20 Lombard Street, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Koen WestenNursing Department, Avans Hogeschool, Onderwijsboulevard 215, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Chris NasZilveren Kruis Achmea, Dellaertweg 1, 2316 WZ, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ionela PetreaDepartment Trimbos International, Trimbos Institute, Da Costakade 45, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Guido PietersDepartment of Psychiatry, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundService providers throughout Europe have identified the need to define how high-quality community-based mental health care looks to organize their own services and to inform governments, commissioners and funders. In 2016, representatives of mental health care service providers, networks, umbrella organizations and knowledge institutes in Europe came together to establish the European Community Mental Health Services Provider (EUCOMS) Network. This network developed a shared vision on the principles and key elements of community mental health care in different contexts. The result is a comprehensive consensus paper, of which this position paper is an outline. With this paper the network wants to contribute to the discussion on how to improve structures in mental healthcare, and to narrow the gap between evidence, policy and practice in Europe. MAIN TEXT: The development of the consensus paper started with an expert workshop in April 2016. An assigned writing group representing the workshop participants built upon the outcomes of this meeting and developed the consensus paper with the input from 100 European counterparts through two additional work groups, and two structured feedback rounds via email. High quality community-based mental health care: 1) protects human rights; 2) has a public health focus; 3) supports service users in their recovery journey; 4) makes use of effective interventions based on evidence and client goals; 5) promotes a wide network of support in the community and; 6) makes use of peer expertise in service design and delivery. Each principle is illustrated with good practices from European service providers that are members of the EUCOMS Network.

conclusionsDiscussion among EUCOMS network members resulted in a blueprint for a regional model of integrated mental health care based upon six principles.

Indexed as

Community NetworksQuality of Health CareCommunity Mental Health ServicesConsensus Statements as TopicEuropeHumansRegional Health PlanningCommunity-based mental health careMental health systemPosition paperPrinciples

Identifiers

PMID31182058
PMCPMC6558752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.