Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182042›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Seroprevalence and risk factors on Syphilis among blood donors in Chengdu, China,from 2005 to 2017.

Shuangli Liu, Liping Luo, Guangxiang Xi, Like Wan, Li Zhong, Xue Chen, Tianxiang Gong, Shuping Li, Yi He, Na Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Magnitude and trend of HIV andAfrican health sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuangli LiuDepartment of Blood Collection, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Liping LuoYibin Blood station, Yibin, China.
Guangxiang XiDepartment of Blood Supply, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Like WanDepartment of Blood Preparation, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Li ZhongDepartment of Donor Service, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Xue ChenBlood Screening Laboratory, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Tianxiang GongBlood research laboratory, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Shuping LiBlood research laboratory, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Yi HeDepartment of Quality Control, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China.
Na LiBlood research laboratory, Chengdu Blood Center, Chengdu, China. star_blue05@126.com.
Guangzhou Blood Center · CNYibin University · CN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province 2015ZR0099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk population of blood donation increases the prevalence of transmit blood-borne diseases and harm the blood safety. Syphilis accounts for approximately 10% of commonly sexually transmitted diseases. The risk factors for blood donors infected with syphilis are also risk factors for other blood borne diseases. The objective of the study is to investigate the seroprevalence and risk factors on syphilis among blood donors, and analyze the donation status of high-risk population.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted in Chengdu Blood Center during 2005 and 2017. Serological test results of volunteer blood donors were collected. Conditional logistic regression models were performed to investigate syphilis-related risk factors and population attributable risk (PAR) was performed to predict the tendencies of high-risk populations' on risky behaviors.

resultsThe serological epidemic for syphilis among blood donors in Chengdu showed an upward trend from 2005 to 2017.TP positive blood donors were more likely to have multiple sexual partners and commercial sex (50.6% vs.22.6, 11.1% vs.4.6%). Multiple condition logistic regression model denoted the following risk factors for increasing rates of syphilis infections: multiple sexual partners (OR = 7.1, 95% CI:1.72-6.58), razor reuse (OR = 1.7;, 95% CI:1.01-2.01); ear piercing (OR = 2.7, 95% CI:1.48-3.37); tattoo (OR = 3.3, 95% CI:1.17-6.78); condom occasionally (OR = 2.8, 95% CI:0.68-1.66). The PAR for each of the risk factors were 0.225, 0.144, 0.147, 0.018, 0.129, 0.018, respectively.

conclusionHealth consultation and screening of high-risk groups before blood donation need to be further improved. Blood donor recruitment should emphasize on excluding the high-risk donors and recruiting more low-risk blood donors. In addition, this study also shows that sharing cosmetic surgical instrument has been proven to transmit blood-borne diseases. Therefore, the syphilis in blood circulation should not be ignored.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsCase-Control StudiesChinaCondomsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleOdds RatioPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesSyphilisBlood donorsBlood safetyHealth consultationRisk factorsSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID31182042
PMCPMC6558839
OpenAlexW2951305236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.