Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181983›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Time-Dependent Myocardial Necrosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Angiographic Collateral Flow Visualized by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results From the Multicenter STEMI-SCAR Project.

Simon Greulich, Agnes Mayr, Steffen Gloekler, Andreas Seitz, Stefan Birkmeier, Tim Schäufele, Raffi Bekeredjian, Christine S Zuern, Peter Seizer, Tobias Geisler and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon Greulich1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases University of Tübingen Germany.
Agnes Mayr2 Department of Radiology University of Innsbruck Austria.
Steffen Gloekler3 Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.
Andreas Seitz5 Department of Cardiology Robert Bosch Medical Center Stuttgart Germany.
Stefan Birkmeier5 Department of Cardiology Robert Bosch Medical Center Stuttgart Germany.
Tim Schäufele5 Department of Cardiology Robert Bosch Medical Center Stuttgart Germany.
Raffi Bekeredjian5 Department of Cardiology Robert Bosch Medical Center Stuttgart Germany.
Christine S Zuern6 Department of Cardiology Universitätsspital Basel Switzerland.
Peter Seizer1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases University of Tübingen Germany.
Tobias Geisler1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases University of Tübingen Germany.
Karin A L Müller1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases University of Tübingen Germany.
Patrick Krumm7 Department of Radiology University of Tübingen Germany.
Konstantin Nikolaou7 Department of Radiology University of Tübingen Germany.
Gert Klug8 Department of Cardiology University of Innsbruck Austria.
Sebastian Reinstadler8 Department of Cardiology University of Innsbruck Austria.
Mathias Pamminger2 Department of Radiology University of Innsbruck Austria.
Martin Reindl8 Department of Cardiology University of Innsbruck Austria.
Andreas Wahl3 Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.
Tobias Traupe3 Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.
Christian Seiler3 Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.
Bernhard Metzler8 Department of Cardiology University of Innsbruck Austria.
Meinrad Gawaz1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases University of Tübingen Germany.
Stephan Windecker3 Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.
Heiko Mahrholdt5 Department of Cardiology Robert Bosch Medical Center Stuttgart Germany.
Universität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Tübingen · DERobert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Acute complete occlusion of a coronary artery results in progressive ischemia, moving from the endocardium to the epicardium (ie, wavefront). Dependent on time to reperfusion and collateral flow, myocardial infarction ( MI ) will manifest, with transmural MI portending poor prognosis. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can detect MI with  high diagnostic accuracy. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST -segment-elevation MI with <12 hours of symptom onset. We sought to visualize time-dependent necrosis in a population with ST -segment-elevation MI by using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (STEMI-SCAR project). Methods and Results ST -segment-elevation MI patients with single-vessel disease, complete occlusion with TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) score 0, absence of collateral flow (Rentrop score 0), and symptom onset <12 hours were consecutively enrolled. Using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, the area at risk and infarct size, myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, and transmurality grade (0-50%, 51-75%, 76-100%) were determined. In total, 164 patients (aged 54±11 years, 80% male) were included. A receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve: 0.81) indicating transmural necrosis revealed the best diagnostic cutoff for a symptom-to-balloon time of 121 minutes: patients with >121 minutes demonstrated increased infarct size, transmurality index, and transmurality grade (all P<0.01) and decreased myocardial salvage index ( P<0.001) versus patients with symptom-to-balloon times ≤121 minutes. Conclusions In MI with no residual antegrade and no collateral flow, immediate reperfusion is vital. A symptom-to-balloon time of >121 minutes causes a high grade of transmural necrosis. In this pure ST -segment-elevation MI population, time to reperfusion to salvage myocardium was less than suggested by current guidelines.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedCardiac Imaging TechniquesContrast MediaFemaleGadoliniumHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumNecrosisST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime FactorsContrast MediaGadoliniumcardiac magnetic resonance imagingcoronary artery diseasenecrosisST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID31181983
PMCPMC6645633
OpenAlexW2950858450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.