Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181979›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Prognostic Value of Anxiety Between Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Tin-Kwang Lin, Bo-Cheng Hsu, Yi-Da Li, Chi-Hsien Chen, Jiunn-Wen Lin, Chen-Yu Chien, Chia-Ying Weng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tin-Kwang Lin1 School of Medicine Tzu Chi University Hualien Taiwan.
Bo-Cheng Hsu3 Department of Psychology National Chung Cheng University Chiayi Taiwan.
Yi-Da Li1 School of Medicine Tzu Chi University Hualien Taiwan.
Chi-Hsien Chen2 Department of Internal Medicine Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation Chiayi Taiwan.
Jiunn-Wen Lin2 Department of Internal Medicine Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation Chiayi Taiwan.
Chen-Yu Chien2 Department of Internal Medicine Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation Chiayi Taiwan.
Chia-Ying Weng3 Department of Psychology National Chung Cheng University Chiayi Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Evidence suggests differences in clinical characteristics, causes, and prognoses between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ( HF r EF ) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Most studies have failed to support the prognostic relevance of anxiety in HF r EF or unclassified HF with mean left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. Meanwhile, the association between anxiety and prognoses in HF p EF remains unexamined. This study compared the prognostic value of anxiety between HF r EF and HF p EF . Methods and Results A total of 158 patients with HF r EF (left ventricular ejection fraction=28.51±7.53%) and 108 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction=64.53±9.67%) were recruited between May 2012 and December 2014. Demographic and clinical characteristics, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory- II scale, and 18-month follow-up outcomes were recorded during the hospital stay. There were significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, laboratory biomarkers, discharge medications, and unhealthy behaviors, which supported the contention that HF r EF and HF p EF represent 2 distinct phenotypes, although there were no significant differences in anxiety and 18-month outcomes. Multiple logistic regression yielded no significant associations between anxiety and 18-month outcomes in HF r EF . By contrast, trait anxiety could predict 18-month all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 1.429; 95% CI, 1.020-2.000; P=0.038), all-cause readmission or death (odds ratio, 1.147; 95% CI , 1.036-1.271; P=0.008), and cardiac readmission or death (odds ratio, 1.133; 95% CI , 1.031-1.245; P=0.010) in HF p EF after adjusting for possible confounders. Conclusions Trait anxiety was independently associated with 18-month all-cause mortality, all-cause readmission or death, and cardiac readmission or death in HF p EF , but not in HF r EF .

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeAdultAgedAnxietyFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesVentricular Function, Leftheart failure with preserved ejection fractionheart failure with reduced ejection fractionmortalityreadmissiontrait anxiety

Identifiers

PMID31181979
PMCPMC6645644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.