Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181858›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills.

Gaetano Marenzi, Josè Camilla Sammartino, Fabio Scherillo, Carlo Rengo, Alfredo De Rosa, Vincenzo Graziano, Gianrico Spagnuolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gaetano MarenziDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
Josè Camilla SammartinoDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology “Lazzaro Spallanzani”, University of Pavia Via Ferrata 9, 27100 Pavia, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-3707-3118
Fabio ScherilloDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, ItalyORCID 0000-0002-2302-8968
Carlo RengoDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dental Medicine, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-1127-0877
Alfredo De RosaDepartment of Odontology and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Via S. Andrea delle Dame 6, 80138 Naples, Italy
Vincenzo GrazianoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
Gianrico SpagnuoloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-3769-9786
University of Naples Federico II · ITSechenov University · RUUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills.

methodsMicrostructure of five dental implant drills using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) integrated with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Vickers microhardness was measured using a CV 2000 microhardness tester with an indentation force of 500 g.

resultsComposition of the implant drills was typical of martensitic stainless steel (MSS). The drills contained 13%-17% of Cr; Mo, Si and Mn were present as minor ligands. The examined bone drills showed different external surface conformation and hardness in relation to the different industrial production processes. A rougher external surface and a higher hardness value are characteristics of the surgical bone drills produced by hot forming; the implant drills produced by machining showed mailing lines on their external surface and a lower hardness.

conclusionsDifferent compositions and treatments were used by the manufacturers to improve the hardness of the external layer of the dental implant drills making them prone to a diverse heat generation during the implant site preparation.

Indexed as

bone drill chemical compositiondental implant drilldrill hardnessmicrostructural surface analysis

Identifiers

PMID31181858
PMCPMC6601286
OpenAlexW2948371601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.