Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181297›Full record

ArticleToxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology2019

Comparative functional analysis of mice after local injection with botulinum neurotoxin A1, A2, A6, and B1 by catwalk analysis.

Molly S Moritz, William H Tepp, Heather N'te Inzalaco, Eric A Johnson, Sabine Pellett

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Clicker Training Mice for Improved Compliance in the Catwalk Test.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Molly S MoritzUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Bacteriology, USA.
William H TeppUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Bacteriology, USA.
Heather N'te InzalacoUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Bacteriology, USA.
Eric A JohnsonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Bacteriology, USA.
Sabine PellettUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Bacteriology, USA. Electronic address: sabine.pellett@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vaccines Against BotulismR01AI118389 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, PELLETT, SABINE · 2015 to 2024
$6.1M
Characterization of Botulinum Neurotoxin A SubtypesR01AI095274 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, ERIC A. · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Characterization of botulinum neurotoxin A subtypesR56AI095274 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, JOHNSON, ERIC A. · 2017 to 2017
$564k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095274NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118389NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI095274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are potent neurotoxins and are the causative agent of botulism, as well as valuable pharmaceuticals. BoNTs are divided into seven serotypes that comprise over 40 reported subtypes. BoNT/A1 and BoNT/B1 are currently the only subtypes approved for pharmaceutical use in the USA. While several other BoNT subtypes including BoNT/A2 and/A6 have been proposed as promising pharmaceuticals, detailed characterization using in vivo assays are essential to determine their pharmaceutical characteristics compared to the currently used BoNT/A1 and/B1. Several methods for studying BoNTs in mice are being used, but no objective and quantitative assay for assessment of functional outcomes after injection has been described. Here we describe the use of CatWalk XT as a new analytical tool for the objective and quantitative analysis of the paralytic effect after local intramuscular injection of BoNT subtypes A1, A2, A6, and B1. Catwalk is a sophisticated gait and locomotion analysis system that quantitatively analyzes a rodent's paw print dimensions and footfall patterns while traversing a glass plate during unforced walk. Significant changes were observed in several gait parameters in mice after local intramuscular injection of all tested BoNT subtypes, however, no changes were observed in mice injected intraperitoneally with the same BoNTs. While a clear difference in time to peak paralysis was observed between BoNT/A1 and/B1, injection of all four toxins resulted in a deficit in the injected limb with the other limbs functionally compensating and with no qualitative differences between the four BoNT subtypes. The presented data demonstrate the utility of CatWalk as a tool for functional outcomes after local BoNT injection through its ability to collect large amounts of quantitative data and objectively analyze sensitive changes in static and dynamic gait parameters.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayBotulinum ToxinsClostridium botulinumGaitMicePeroneal NerveSciatic NerveTibial NerveToxicity TestsBotulinum ToxinsA1A2A6B1BoNTBotulinum neurotoxinCatwalkIntramuscular injection

Identifiers

PMID31181297
PMCPMC6688953
OpenAlexW2952279533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.