Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181100›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

What format of treatment do patients with emotional disorders prefer and why? Implications for public mental health settings and policies.

Jorge Osma, Carlos Suso-Ribera, Óscar Peris-Baquero, Marta Gil-Lacruz, Luisa Pérez-Ayerra, Vanesa Ferreres-Galan, Mª Ángeles Torres-Alfosea, María López-Escriche, Olga Domínguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jorge OsmaDepartamento de psicología y sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-318X
Carlos Suso-RiberaDepartamento de psicología básica, clínica y psicobiología, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Óscar Peris-BaqueroInstituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
Marta Gil-LacruzDepartamento de psicología y sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8261-058X
Luisa Pérez-AyerraCSM La Milagrosa, Pamplona, Spain.
Vanesa Ferreres-GalanHospital Comarcal de Vinaròs, Castellón, Spain.
Mª Ángeles Torres-AlfoseaHospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
María López-EscricheCSM Sedaví, Valencia, Spain.
Olga DomínguezUSM La Font de San Lluís, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe analyzed the preference of three psychological intervention formats-individual, group, and online-in a sample of 267 patients with a primary diagnosis of emotional disorder in Spanish public mental health settings.

methodWe studied patients' preferences considering sociodemographic characteristics, diagnoses, history of psychological treatments, number of sessions, and satisfaction with past interventions.

resultsMost participants (85.4%) preferred psychological treatment in an individual format, 14.2% in group, and 0.4% online. When comparing the people who chose individual and group treatment, no demographic or clinical differences were found. The arguments against group format were the lack of privacy and expression difficulties. Regarding online format, these included being considered impersonal and ineffective.

conclusionThe rejection of group and online psychotherapy formats allows us to define the actions we should carry out in public mental health settings to improve the acceptance of more cost-effective therapy formats.

Indexed as

AdultAnxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMood DisordersPsychotherapyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID31181100
PMCPMC6557569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.