Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181096›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Trust but verify: Is there a role for active surveillance in monitoring adverse events in Zimbabwe's large-scale male circumcision program?

Phiona Marongwe, Paidamoyo Gonouya, Thoko Madoda, Vernon Murenje, Mufuta Tshimanga, Shirish Balachandra, John Mandisarisa, Vuyelwa Sidile-Chitimbire, Sinokuthemba Xaba, Batsirai Makunike-Chikwinya and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Phiona MarongweInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Paidamoyo GonouyaZimbabwe Association of Church-related Hospitals (ZACH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Thoko MadodaZimbabwe Community Health Intervention Project (ZiCHIRe), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vernon MurenjeInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Mufuta TshimangaZimbabwe Community Health Intervention Project (ZiCHIRe), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Shirish BalachandraU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Harare, Zimbabwe.
John MandisarisaU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vuyelwa Sidile-ChitimbireZimbabwe Association of Church-related Hospitals (ZACH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sinokuthemba XabaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Batsirai Makunike-ChikwinyaInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Marrianne HolecInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Scott BarnhartInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Caryl FeldackerInternational Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8152-6754
Practical Action · ZWUniversity of Washington · USZimbabwe Association of Church-Related Hospitals · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWOffice of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology · US

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH000972PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnsuring quality service provision is fundamental to ZAZIC's voluntary medical male circumcision (MC) program in Zimbabwe. From October, 2014 to September, 2017, ZAZIC conducted 205,847 MCs. Passive surveillance recorded a combined moderate and severe adverse event (AE) rate of 0.3%; reported adherence to follow-up was 95%, suggesting program safety. Despite encouraging passive surveillance data, verification of data quality and accuracy would increase confidence in AE identification.

methodsFrom May to August, 2017, ZAZIC implemented a focused quality assurance (QA) study on AE ascertainment and documentation at 6 purposively-selected, high-volume MC sites. ZAZIC Gold-Standard (GS) clinicians prospectively observed 100 post-MC follow-ups per site in tandem with facility-based MC providers to confirm and characterize AEs, providing mentoring in AE management when needed. GS clinicians also retrospectively reviewed site-based, routine MC data, comparing recorded to reported AEs, and held brief qualitative interviews with site leadership on AE-related issues.

resultsObserved AE rates varied from 1-8%, potentially translating to thousands of unidentified AEs if observed AE rates were applied to previous MC performance. Most observed AEs were infections among younger clients. Retrospective review found discrepancies in AE documentation and reporting. Interviews suggest human resource and transport issues challenge MC follow-up visit attendance. Post-operative self-care appears to produce generally good results for adults; however, younger clients and guardians need additional attention to ensure quality care. There was no evidence of missed severe AEs resulting in permanent impairment or morbidity.

conclusionsAlthough results cannot be generalized, active surveillance suggests that AEs may be higher and follow-up lower than reported. In response, ZAZIC's Quality Assurance Task Force will replicate this QA study in other sites; increase training in AE identification, management, and documentation for clinical and data teams; and improve post-operative counseling for younger clients. Additional nurses and vehicles, especially in rural health clinics, could be beneficial.

Indexed as

AdultCircumcision, MaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleQuality Assurance, Health CareVoluntary ProgramsWatchful WaitingZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID31181096
PMCPMC6557516
OpenAlexW2951221544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.