Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31181060›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Zebra skin odor repels the savannah tsetse fly, Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae).

Olabimpe Y Olaide, David P Tchouassi, Abdullahi A Yusuf, Christian W W Pirk, Daniel K Masiga, Rajinder K Saini, Baldwyn Torto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zebra stripes: the questions raised by the answers.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tsetse Bloodmeal Analyses Incriminate the Common WarthogPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Zebra stripes, tabanid biting flies and the aperture effect.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Olabimpe Y OlaideInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-2846
David P TchouassiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Abdullahi A YusufDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.
Christian W W PirkDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.
Daniel K MasigaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Rajinder K SainiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Baldwyn TortoInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican trypanosomosis, primarily transmitted by tsetse flies, remains a serious public health and economic challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Interventions employing natural repellents from non-preferred hosts of tsetse flies represent a promising management approach. Although zebras have been identified as non-preferred hosts of tsetse flies, the basis for this repellency is poorly understood. We hypothesized that zebra skin odors contribute to their avoidance by tsetse flies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe evaluated the effect of crude zebra skin odors on catches of wild savannah tsetse flies (Glossina pallidipes Austen, 1903) using unbaited Ngu traps compared to the traps baited with two known tsetse fly management chemicals; a repellent blend derived from waterbuck odor, WRC (comprising geranylacetone, guaiacol, pentanoic acid and δ-octalactone), and an attractant comprising cow urine and acetone, in a series of Latin square-designed experiments. Coupled gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection (GC/EAD) and GC-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analyses of zebra skin odors identified seven electrophysiologically-active components; 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, acetophenone, geranylacetone, heptanal, octanal, nonanal and decanal, which were tested in blends and singly for repellency to tsetse flies when combined with Ngu traps baited with cow urine and acetone in field trials. The crude zebra skin odors and a seven-component blend of the EAD-active components, formulated in their natural ratio of occurrence in zebra skin odor, significantly reduced catches of G. pallidipesby 66.7% and 48.9% respectively, and compared favorably with the repellency of WRC (58.1%- 59.2%). Repellency of the seven-component blend was attributed to the presence of the three ketones 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, acetophenone and geranylacetone, which when in a blend caused a 62.7% reduction in trap catch of G. pallidipes. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings reveal fundamental insights into tsetse fly ecology and the allomonal effect of zebra skin odor, and potential integration of the three-component ketone blend into the management toolkit for tsetse and African trypanosomosis control.

Indexed as

Skin Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsEquidaeFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryInsect RepellentsMaleOdorantsTsetse FliesInsect Repellents

Identifiers

PMID31181060
PMCPMC6586361
OpenAlexW2951318664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.