Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31180586›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Known-component 3D image reconstruction for improved intraoperative imaging in spine surgery: A clinical pilot study.

Xiaoxuan Zhang, Ali Uneri, J Webster Stayman, Corinna C Zygourakis, Sheng-Fu L Lo, Nicholas Theodore, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Joint CT reconstruction of anatomy and implants using a mixed prior model.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Joint Estimation of Anatomy and Implants in X-ray CT using a Mixed Prior Model.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. [Innovative 3D imaging].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Data-Driven Detection and Registration of Spine Surgery Instrumentation in Intraoperative Images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. New spinal robotic technologies.Frontiers of medicine · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoxuan ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ali UneriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
J Webster StaymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Corinna C ZygourakisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Sheng-Fu L LoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Nicholas TheodoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226NIH HHS R01-EB-017226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative imaging plays an increased role in support of surgical guidance and quality assurance for interventional approaches. However, image quality sufficient to detect complications and provide quantitative assessment of the surgical product is often confounded by image noise and artifacts. In this work, we translated a three-dimensional model-based image reconstruction (referred to as "Known-Component Reconstruction," KC-Recon) for the first time to clinical studies with the aim of resolving both limitations.

methodsKC-Recon builds upon a penalized weighted least-squares (PWLS) method by incorporating models of surgical instrumentation ("known components") within a joint image registration-reconstruction process to improve image quality. Under IRB approval, a clinical pilot study was conducted with 17 spine surgery patients imaged under informed consent using the O-arm cone-beam CT system (Medtronic, Littleton MA) before and after spinal instrumentation. Volumetric images were generated for each patient using KC-Recon in comparison to conventional filtered backprojection (FBP). Imaging performance prior to instrumentation ("preinstrumentation") was evaluated in terms of soft-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution. The quality of images obtained after the instrumentation ("postinstrumentation") was assessed by quantifying the magnitude of metal artifacts (blooming and streaks) arising from pedicle screws. The potential low-dose advantages of the algorithm were tested by simulating low-dose data (down to one-tenth of the dose of standard protocols) from images acquired at normal dose.

resultsPreinstrumentation images (at normal clinical dose and matched resolution) exhibited an average 24.0% increase in soft-tissue CNR with KC-Recon compared to FBP (N = 16, P = 0.02), improving visualization of paraspinal muscles, major vessels, and other soft-tissues about the spine and abdomen. For a total of 72 screws in postinstrumentation images, KC-Recon yielded a significant reduction in metal artifacts: 66.3% reduction in overestimation of screw shaft width due to blooming (P < 0.0001) and reduction in streaks at the screw tip (65.8% increase in attenuation accuracy, P < 0.0001), enabling clearer depiction of the screw within the pedicle and vertebral body for an assessment of breach. Depending on the imaging task, dose reduction up to an order of magnitude appeared feasible while maintaining soft-tissue visibility and metal artifact reduction.

conclusionsKC-Recon offers a promising means to improve visualization in the presence of surgical instrumentation and reduce patient dose in image-guided procedures. The improved soft-tissue visibility could facilitate the use of cone-beam CT to soft-tissue surgeries, and the ability to precisely quantify and visualize instrument placement could provide a valuable check against complications in the operating room (cf., postoperative CT).

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographySurgery, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArtifactsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntraoperative PeriodMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRadiation DosageSpineYoung Adultcone-beam CTimage-guided proceduresintraoperative imagingmodel-based image reconstructionpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID31180586
PMCPMC6692215
OpenAlexW2950696110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.