ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
De novo transcriptome analysis of gene responses to pest feeding in leaves of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A Novel Analysis Method for Simultaneous Determination of 31 Pesticides by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Ginseng.Journal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the transcriptomic differences between Panax ginseng [Renshen (RS)] plants bitten by pests (n=3, test group; samples defined as RS11‑13) or not (n=3, control group; samples defined as RS1‑3) using de novo RNA sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform. A total of 51,097,386 (99.6%), 49,310,564 (99.5%), 59,192,372 (99.6%), 60,338,540 (99.5%), 56,976,410 (99.6%) and 54,226,588 (99.6%) clean reads were obtained for RS11, RS12, RS13, RS1, RS2 and RS3, respectively. De novo assembly generated 370,267 unigenes, 927 of which were differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 782 significantly upregulated and 145 significantly downregulated genes. Function enrichment analysis revealed that these DEGs were located in 28 significantly enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways, including phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (for example, TRINITY_DN30766_c0_g2_i1, encoding peroxidase 20) and mitogen‑activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling (TRINITY_DN85589_c0_g1_i1, encoding WRKY transcription factor 75). Weighted gene co‑expression network analysis identified modules including TRINITY_DN85589_c0_g1_i1, TRINITY_DN58279_c0_g1_i1 [encoding aspartyl protease (AP)] and TRINITY_DN74866_c0_g2_i1 [encoding 12‑oxophytodienoate reductase (OPR)] that may be the most significantly associated with pest responses. In this module, TRINITY_DN85589_c0_g1_i1 may co‑express with TRINITY_DN58279_c0_g1_i1 or TRINITY_DN74866_c0_g2_i1. WRYK and AP have been suggested to promote the activity of antioxidant peroxidase. Collectively, the findings from the present study suggested that a MAPK‑WRKY‑OPR/AP‑peroxidase signaling pathway may be a potentially important mechanism underlying defense responses against pests in ginseng plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.