Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31180375›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2019

An evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging with histogram analysis in patients with idiopathic subjective tinnitus.

Murat Baykara, Saime Sagiroglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murat BaykaraDepartment of Radiology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Saime SagirogluDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTinnitus is defined as the perception of sound in the ears without any acoustic stimulus. It has still not been determined whether tinnitus originates peripherally, centrally, or from several locations. The aim of the study was to determine any possible cochlear pathology in patients with normal hearing and tinnitus of unspecified etiology.

methodsThe study included 22 patients who presented at the clinic with the complaint of idiopathic subjective tinnitus that had been ongoing for at least 1 year. A total of 44 ears were included; 28 with tinnitus and 16 healthy ears. Unilateral tinnitus was determined in 16 patients and bilateral in six patients. The temporal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and audiogram results of the patients were retrieved from the hospital records. The MRI histogram measurement was made automatically and calculated for each ear separately.

resultsEntropy was found to be significantly higher in the control group and distribution was lower (p>0.01). In the tinnitus group, distribution was found to be broader, and kurtosis was statistically significantly greater (p<0.001).

conclusionMRI histogram analysis can be considered as a method to be used in the clinical evaluation of the determination of possible cochlear pathology in ears with tinnitus.

Indexed as

Cochleaentropymagnetic resonance imagingtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID31180375
PMCPMC6526986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.