Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31180341›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2019

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer.

Rebecca Smith, Kaylyn Devlin, David Kilburn, Sean Gross, Damir Sudar, Elmar Bucher, Michel Nederlof, Mark Dane, Joe W Gray, Laura Heiser and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Annual review of cancer biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Automatic Transformation and Integration to Improve Visualization and Discovery of Latent Effects in Imaging Data.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca SmithDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
Kaylyn DevlinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
David KilburnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
Sean GrossDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
Damir SudarQuantitative Imaging Systems LLC.
Elmar BucherDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
Michel NederlofQuantitative Imaging Systems LLC.
Mark DaneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
Joe W GrayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
Laura HeiserDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University.
James E KorkolaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University; korkola@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

OutreachU54HG008100 · NHGRI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, JOE W., HEISER, LAURA MADELINE · 2014 to 2019
$10.5M
Understanding the Impact of Microscale and Nanoscale Heterogeneity and ResistanceU54CA209988 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2017 to 2021
$10.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209988NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG008100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impact of the microenvironment on the phenotype of cells is a difficult problem due to the complex mixture of both soluble growth factors and matrix-associated proteins in the microenvironment in vivo. Furthermore, readily available reagents for the modeling of microenvironments in vitro typically utilize complex mixtures of proteins that are incompletely defined and suffer from batch to batch variability. The microenvironment microarray (MEMA) platform allows for the assessment of thousands of simple combinations of microenvironment proteins for their impact on cellular phenotypes in a single assay. The MEMAs are prepared in well plates, which allows the addition of individual ligands to separate wells containing arrayed extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. The combination of the soluble ligand with each printed ECM forms a unique combination. A typical MEMA assay contains greater than 2,500 unique combinatorial microenvironments that cells are exposed to in a single assay. As a test case, the breast cancer cell line MCF7 was plated on the MEMA platform. Analysis of this assay identified factors that both enhance and inhibit the growth and proliferation of these cells. The MEMA platform is highly flexible and can be extended for use with other biological questions beyond cancer research.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix ProteinsHumansLigandsMCF-7 CellsMicroarray AnalysisNeoplasmsPhenotypeExtracellular Matrix ProteinsLigands

Identifiers

PMID31180341
PMCPMC6736605
OpenAlexW2946509261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.