ArticleAJOB empirical bioethics
Cancer Clinical Trial Patient-Participants' Perceptions about Provider Communication and Dropout Intentions.
Article in AJOB empirical bioethics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timeliness, Coordination, Clarity, and Kindness: Patients' Interpretations of Provider Actions as Indicators of Quality Cancer Care.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
- The Dedicated Inflammatory Bowel Disease Nurse, If You Know Them, You Love Them: Survey of the Italian IBD Patients' Association.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2025Article
- Impact of Platform Design and Usability on Adherence and Retention: Randomized Web- and Mobile-Based Longitudinal Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Preferences and Attitudes Towards Digital Communication and Symptom Reporting Methods in Clinical Trials.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- General Practitioners (GP) experiences in managing patients in clinical trials conducted by non-GP specialists: An exploratory qualitative study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Article
- Improving patient satisfaction based on service quality in clinical trials: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Performance and usability evaluation of a mobile health data capture application in clinical cancer trials follow-up.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Participation in and withdrawal from cancer clinical trials: A survey of clinical research coordinators.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study.International wound journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.