Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31180155›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2019

Myopia control with novel central and peripheral plus contact lenses and extended depth of focus contact lenses: 2 year results from a randomised clinical trial.

Padmaja Sankaridurg, Ravi C Bakaraju, Thomas Naduvilath, Xiang Chen, Rebecca Weng, Daniel Tilia, Pauline Xu, Wayne Li, Fabian Conrad, Earl L Smith and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04618510 (Efficacy of SEED's Novel Anti-myopia Contact Lens), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04618510 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of SEED's Novel Anti-myopia Contact Lens (Daily Disposable) in Controlling Myopia Progression

TypeinterventionalSponsorL.V. Prasad Eye InstituteRan2020 to 2022Enrolled108ConditionsMyopiaArmsSEED 1-dayPure EDOF soft contact lens, Single Vision Spectacles
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in UK children: Outcomes from a 2-year multi-site interventional trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Adverse event rates in the retrospective cohort study of safety of paediatric soft contact lens wear: the ReCSS study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Myopia control with novel central and peripheral plus contact lenses and extended depth of focus contact lenses: 2 year results from a randomised clinical trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2019
    Trial
  20. Causes of Reduced Vision in Australian Children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Padmaja SankaridurgBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5537-6193
Ravi C BakarajuBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Thomas NaduvilathBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Xiang ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Sun Yet Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Rebecca WengBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Daniel TiliaBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Pauline XuBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Wayne LiBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Fabian ConradBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Earl L SmithCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Klaus EhrmannBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Brien Holden Vision Institute · AUSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to determine myopia control efficacy with novel contact lenses (CL) that (1) reduced both central and peripheral defocus, and (2) provided extended depth of focus with better global retinal image quality for points on, and anterior to, the retina and degraded for points posterior to the retina.

methodsChildren (n = 508, 8-13 years) with cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) -0.75 to -3.50D were enrolled in a prospective, double blind trial and randomised to one of five groups: (1) single vision, silicone hydrogel (SH) CL; (2) two groups wearing SH CL that imposed myopic defocus across peripheral and central retina (test CL I and II; +1.00D centrally and +2.50 and +1.50 for CL I and II at 3 mm semi-chord respectively); and (3) two groups wearing extended depth of focus (EDOF) hydrogel CL incorporating higher order aberrations to modulate retinal image quality (test CL III and IV; extended depth of focus of up to +1.75D and +2.50D respectively). Cycloplegic autorefraction and axial length (AL) measurements were conducted at six monthly intervals. Compliance to lens wear was assessed with a diary and collected at each visit. Additionally, subjective responses to various aspects of lens wear were assessed. The trial commenced in February 2014 and was terminated in January 2017 due to site closure. Myopia progression over time between groups was compared using linear mixed models and where needed post hoc analysis with Bonferroni corrections conducted.

resultsMyopia progressed with control CL -1.12 ± 0.51D/0.58 ± 0.27 mm for SE/AL at 24 months. In comparison, all test CL had reduced progression with SE/AL ranging from -0.78D to -0.87D/0.41-0.46 mm at 24 months (AL: p < 0.05 for all test CL; SE p < 0.05 for test CL III and IV) and represented a reduction in axial length elongation of about 22% to 32% and reduction in spherical equivalent of 24% to 32%. With test CL, a greater slowing ranging from 26% to 43% was observed in compliant wearers (≥6 days per week; Control CL: -0.64D/0.30 mm and -1.14D/0.58 mm vs test CL: -0.42D to -0.47D/0.12-0.18 mm and -0.70 to -0.81D/0.19-0.25 mm at 12 and 24 months respectively).

conclusionsContact lenses that either imposed myopic defocus at the retina or modulated retinal image quality resulted in a slower progression of myopia with greater efficacy seen in compliant wearers. Importantly, there was no difference in the myopia control provided by either of these strategies.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicAdolescentAnalysis of VarianceChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMyopia, DegenerativeProspective StudiesProsthesis Designcentral and peripheral plus contact lensesextended depth of focus contact lensesmyopiaprogression

Identifiers

PMID31180155
PMCPMC6851825
OpenAlexW2951303995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.