ArticleJournal of biosciences2019
Protein fingerprinting with digital sequences of linear protein subsequence volumes: a computational study.
Article in Journal of biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole protein sequencing and quantification without proteolysis, terminal residue cleavage, or purification: A computational model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Strategies for Development of a Next-Generation Protein Sequencing Platform.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins in a proteome can be identified from a sequence of K integers equal to the digitized volumes of subsequences with L residues from the primary sequence of a stretched protein. Exhaustive computations on the proteins of Helicobacter pylori (UniProt id UP000000210) with L and K in the range 4-8 show that approx. 90% of the proteins can be identified uniquely in this manner. This computational result can be translated into practice with a nanopore, an emerging technology that does not require analyte immobilization, proteolysis or labeling. Unlike other methods, most of which focus on a specific target protein, nanopore-based methods enable the identification of multiple proteins from a sample in a single run. Recent work by Kennedy, Kolmogorov and associates shows that the blockade current due to a protein molecule translocating through a nanopore is roughly proportional to one or more contiguous residues. The present study points to a modified version in which the volumes of subsequences (rather than of single residues) may be obtained by integrating the blockade current due to L contiguous residues. The advantages arising from this include lower detector bandwidth, elimination of the homopolymer problem and reduced noise. Because an identifier is based on near as well as distant (up to 2KL-L) residues, this approach uses more global information than an approach based on single residues and short-range correlations. The results of the study, which are available in a data supplement, are discussed in detail. Potential implementation issues are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31180067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.