ReviewJournal of biosciences2019
Restriction enzymes and their use in molecular biology: An overview.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using nucleolytic toxins as restriction enzymes enables new RNA applications.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Mapping crossover events of mouse meiotic recombination by restriction fragment ligation-based Refresh-seq.Cell discovery · 2024Article
- Culturable Bacterial Endophytes of Wild White Poplar (Biology · 2023Article
- Structural and functional investigation of GajB protein in Gabija anti-phage defense.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- PlasMapper 3.0-a web server for generating, editing, annotating and visualizing publication quality plasmid maps.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Bacteriophage strategies for overcoming host antiviral immunity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Application of 16S rRNA virtual RFLP for the discrimination of some closely taxonomic-related lactobacilli species.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2022Article
- Hybrid Nucleic Acid-Quantum Dot Assemblies as Multiplexed Reporter Platforms for Cell-Free Transcription Translation-Based Biosensors.ACS synthetic biology · 2022Article
- Rolling Circle Enhanced Detection of Specific Restriction Endonuclease Activities in Crude Cell Extracts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Era of Molecular Diagnostics Techniques before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- Review
- Proposal of the Annotation of Phosphorylated Amino Acids and Peptides Using Biological and Chemical Codes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An Update on Molecular Tools for Genetic Engineering of Actinomycetes-The Source of Important Antibiotics and Other Valuable Compounds.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Genetic Markers in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restriction enzymes have been identified in the early 1950s of the past century and have quickly become key players in the molecular biology of DNA. Forty years ago, the scientists whose pioneering work had explored the activity and sequence specificity of these enzymes, contributing to the definition of their enormous potential as tools for DNA characterization, mapping and manipulation, were awarded the Nobel Prize. In this short review, we celebrate the history of these enzymes in the light of their many different uses, as these proteins have accompanied the history of DNA for over 50 years representing active witnesses of major steps in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31180051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.