ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2018
Estimation of weight in adults from height: a novel option for a quick bedside technique.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06269861 (Evaluation of the Relation of the Body Weight Calculated by Visual Estimation and Anthropometric Measurements to the Actual Body Weight Measured by the Patient Transfer Scale in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Relation of the Body Weight Calculated by Visual Estimation and Anthropometric Measurements to the Actual Body Weight Measured by the Patient Transfer Scale in Critically Ill Patients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermal imaging responses of lower-limb muscles following anaerobic testing in male soccer players: A time-series approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Validation of anthropometric-based weight prediction equations among Ugandan adults: A Cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparison of adult weight estimation methods for use during emergency medical care.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021Article
- Effects of body mass index on propofol-induced cardiovascular depression in the Pakistani population.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn critical care situations, there are often neither the means nor the time to weigh each patient before administering strict weight-based drugs/procedures. A convenient, quick and accurate method is a priority in such circumstances for safety and effectiveness in emergent interventions as none exists in adults while those available are complex and yet to be validated. We aimed to study the correlation and accuracy of a quick bedside method of weight estimation in adults using height.
methodThe technique is estimated body weight-eBW(kg) = (N - 1)100, where 'N' is the measured height in metres. Adult undergraduates were enrolled 10/09/2015. Their heights and weights were measured while the formula was used to obtain the estimated weight. The SPSS version 21.0, Chicago, IL, USA was utilised for data analysis.
resultsWe analysed 122 participants aged 21-38 years with height = 1.55 m-1.95 m. The actual body weight range = 48.0 kg-91.0 kg, mean = 65.3 kg ± 9.7 kg and S.E. = 2.0 while eBW = 55 kg-95 kg, mean = 69.1 kg ± 8.4 kg and S.E. = 1.5. On BMI classes, a positive predictive value of 94.7% for the 'normal' category and 95.5% for 'overweight'. Correlation coefficient at 99% confidence interval yielded (r) = + 1, (P = 0.000) while the linear regression coefficient (r
conclusionThis unprecedented statistical characterisation of the two weight estimate measures to have a good agreement scientifically proposes the utility of our method with the formula eBW(kg) = 100(N-1) in critical care and ATLS protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.