ArticleACS omega2019
Rapid Identification of Novel Psychoactive and Other Controlled Substances Using Low-Field
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Benchtop NMR and HPLC-UV for Illicit Drug Mixtures.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2025Article
- Characterization of new psychoactive substances by integrating benchtop NMR to multi-technique databases.Drug testing and analysis · 2022Article
- Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of selective molecularly imprinted polymers for the fast determination of synthetic cathinones.RSC advances · 2021Article
- High-throughput screening of argan oil composition and authenticity using benchtopMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2020Article
- City checking: Piloting the UK's first community-based drug safety testing (drug checking) service in 2 city centres.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An automated approach to the collection of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.