Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179394›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2019

Next-generation sequencing for the detection of microorganisms present in human donor corneal preservation medium.

Mohit Parekh, Davide Borroni, Vito Romano, Stephen B Kaye, Davide Camposampiero, Diego Ponzin, Stefano Ferrari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the Healthy Eye Microbiota Niche in a Multicenter Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Shotgun sequencing to determine corneal infection.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2020
    Article
  15. Metagenomics in ophthalmology: Hypothesis or real prospective?Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohit Parekh *Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-068X
Davide Borroni *St. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Vito RomanoSt. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen B KayeSt. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Davide CamposampieroInternational Center for Ocular Physiopathology, Fondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy.
Diego PonzinInternational Center for Ocular Physiopathology, Fondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy.
Stefano FerrariInternational Center for Ocular Physiopathology, Fondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto Onlus, Venice, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo detect the presence of microorganisms in the storage media of human donor corneas using next-generation sequencing method.

methodsSeven samples from organ culture (OC) group (Cornea Max, Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) with one control (sterile media without any cornea) and seven samples from hypothermic storage group (Cornea Cold, Eurobio) with one control were used for this study. The corneas were placed in the respective storage media for 14 days before collecting the samples. Storage media (2 mL) from each sample were collected in RNAase-free tubes and shipped for ribosomal RNA sequencing of 16 S and 18 S. Simultaneously, another 1 mL of media sample was used for conventional diagnostic method (CDM) using Bactec instruments.

resultsIn both, OC and hypothermic storage and control samples, the most abundant genera were

conclusionMetagenomics provides full taxonomic profiling of the detected genomic material of the organisms and thus has the potential to deliver a much wider microbiological diagnostic approach than CDM. The costs and turn-around time need to be reduced, and; the detection of viable organisms would help this technology to be introduced into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

16S18Sbacteriacorneaeye bankfungusmediamicrobiologyNGSpreservationstorage

Identifiers

PMID31179394
PMCPMC6528759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.