Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179278›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019

Monte Carlo Simulations for the Analysis of Non-linear Parameter Confidence Intervals in Optimal Experimental Design.

Niels Krausch, Tilman Barz, Annina Sawatzki, Mathis Gruber, Sarah Kamel, Peter Neubauer, Mariano Nicolas Cruz Bournazou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Towards the Experimentally-InformedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  12. Automated Conditional Screening of MultipleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niels KrauschDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tilman BarzDepartment of Energy, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Annina SawatzkiDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mathis GruberDexLeChem GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah KamelDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter NeubauerDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mariano Nicolas Cruz BournazouDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Department of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Especially in biomanufacturing, methods to design optimal experiments are a valuable technique to fully exploit the potential of the emerging technical possibilities that are driving experimental miniaturization and parallelization. The general objective is to reduce the experimental effort while maximizing the information content of an experiment, speeding up knowledge gain in R&D. The approach of model-based design of experiments (known as MBDoE) utilizes the information of an underlying mathematical model describing the system of interest. A common method to predict the accuracy of the parameter estimates uses the Fisher information matrix to approximate the 90% confidence intervals of the estimates. However, for highly non-linear models, this method might lead to wrong conclusions. In such cases, Monte Carlo sampling gives a more accurate insight into the parameter's estimate probability distribution and should be exploited to assess the reliability of the approximations made through the Fisher information matrix. We first introduce the model-based optimal experimental design for parameter estimation including parameter identification and validation by means of a simple non-linear Michaelis-Menten kinetic and show why Monte Carlo simulations give a more accurate depiction of the parameter uncertainty. Secondly, we propose a very robust and simple method to find optimal experimental designs using Monte Carlo simulations. Although computational expensive, the method is easy to implement and parallelize. This article focuses on practical examples of bioprocess engineering but is generally applicable in other fields.

Indexed as

design of experimentsdynamic processesmodelingMonte Carlovariance analysis

Identifiers

PMID31179278
PMCPMC6543167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.