ArticleCase reports in oncological medicine2019
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Case reports in oncological medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Checkpoint inhibition and beyond: Precision immune engineering for the immune-privileged landscape of ocular malignancies.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Review
- The Future of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Uveal Melanoma: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- Uveal melanoma: Recent advances in immunotherapy.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Vitreous metastasis from cutaneous melanoma: diagnosis and management.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023Article
- Review
- Identification of Precise Therapeutic Targets and Characteristic Prognostic Genes Based on Immune Gene Characteristics in Uveal Melanoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Usefulness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab immunotherapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2020Article
- Review
- The Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Uveal Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Uveal melanoma: progress in molecular biology and therapeutics.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
- Combined immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic uveal melanoma: a retrospective, multi-center study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2019Article
- Immunobiology of Uveal Melanoma: State of the Art and Therapeutic Targets.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Micro RNAs Promoting Growth and Metastasis in PreclinicalCancer genomics & proteomicsReview
- Corrigendum to "Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience".Case reports in oncological medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4-15 months. Despite new insights into the genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfactory systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. The study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently needed. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective case series of 8 patients with MUM managed at the University of Cincinnati between January 2015 and January 2018. The immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) 1.1 criteria were used for patient evaluation, and magnetic resonance imaging was used for evaluation at treatment checkpoints.
objectiveTo assess the clinical outcome of patients with MUM treated with a combination of checkpoint inhibitors.
resultsThe series included eight patients, six men and two women, with MUM. Their median age at MUM diagnosis was 69 (range, 55-77) years. All patients were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination along with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), followed by nivolumab maintenance and monthly TACE procedures. The majority of patients had a partial response or stable disease. Two of the patients had partial response, while four others had stable disease. Two other patients experienced disease progression.
conclusionWe report the outcomes of eight patients with MUM treated with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. We report the clinical outcome and toxicity associated with this treatment approach. Further studies are warranted to explore immunotherapy in MUM. These findings support the consideration of immunotherapy in MUM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.