ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019
Novel risk model for predicting acute adverse drug reactions following cardiac catheterization from TRUST study (The Safety and toleRability of UltraviSt in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CaTheterization).
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and management of iodine contrast media-related anaphylactic shock during cardiac catheterization.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide After Intra-Arterial Versus Intravenous Administration: A Nested Case-Control Analysis of 133,331 Patients.Investigative radiology · 2020Observational
- Acute adverse drug reactions with contrast media after cardiac catheterization: can we identify those at risk?Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Acute adverse drug reactions following cardiac catheterization: evidence-based guidance for providers and systems.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Predicting acute adverse contrast mean reactions following cardiac catheterization: a complex undertaking.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute drug reactions (ADRs) are common complications of contrast administration following cardiac catheterization. Serious reactions may be life threatening. However, few risk models for predicting ADRs exist. The study aims to develop a novel tool for predicting the risk of ADRs [occurring within 1 hour in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)].
methodsA total of 17,139 consecutive patients included in the TRUST study were randomly (2:1) assigned to a development data set (n=11,426) or a validation data set (n=5,713). Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), including age, contrast dose, premedication, and prehydration. The performance of our model was assessed using the c-statistic for discrimination and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration.
resultsThe overall incidence of ADRs was 42 (0.37%) in the development data set: 0.09% in the low-risk category (score: 0-2), 0.36% in the moderate-risk category (score: 3-4), and 1.78% in the high-risk category (score ≥5). The risk score across the subgroup of the study population exhibited good discrimination and predictive ability for ADRs (c-statistic: 0.694). Meanwhile, the calibration was also demonstrated to be accurate by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (P=0.305).
conclusionsOur data showed that our simple risk model showed good discrimination and predictive ability of ADRs following cardiac catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.