Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179105›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Novel risk model for predicting acute adverse drug reactions following cardiac catheterization from TRUST study (The Safety and toleRability of UltraviSt in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CaTheterization).

Yibo He, Yuming Huang, Junqing Yang, Jin Liu, Guoli Sun, Feier Song, Shiqun Chen, Ning Tan, Zhonghan Ni, Yong Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yibo HeGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Yuming HuangGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Junqing YangGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Jin LiuGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Guoli SunGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Feier SongGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Shiqun ChenGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Ning TanGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Zhonghan NiGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Yong LiuGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Jiyan ChenGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute drug reactions (ADRs) are common complications of contrast administration following cardiac catheterization. Serious reactions may be life threatening. However, few risk models for predicting ADRs exist. The study aims to develop a novel tool for predicting the risk of ADRs [occurring within 1 hour in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)].

methodsA total of 17,139 consecutive patients included in the TRUST study were randomly (2:1) assigned to a development data set (n=11,426) or a validation data set (n=5,713). Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), including age, contrast dose, premedication, and prehydration. The performance of our model was assessed using the c-statistic for discrimination and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration.

resultsThe overall incidence of ADRs was 42 (0.37%) in the development data set: 0.09% in the low-risk category (score: 0-2), 0.36% in the moderate-risk category (score: 3-4), and 1.78% in the high-risk category (score ≥5). The risk score across the subgroup of the study population exhibited good discrimination and predictive ability for ADRs (c-statistic: 0.694). Meanwhile, the calibration was also demonstrated to be accurate by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (P=0.305).

conclusionsOur data showed that our simple risk model showed good discrimination and predictive ability of ADRs following cardiac catheterization.

Indexed as

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs)contrast mediacoronary angiographypercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)risk assessmentrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID31179105
PMCPMC6531703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.