Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179101›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Routine practice in mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery in Italy.

Elena Bignami, Antonio Di Lullo, Francesco Saglietti, Marcello Guarnieri, Vincenzo Pota, Sabino Scolletta, Carlo Alberto Volta, Luigi Vetrugno, Franco Cavaliere, Luigi Tritapepe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Elena BignamiAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Antonio Di LulloDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco SagliettiUniversity of Milan-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Italy.
Marcello GuarnieriUniversity of Milan-Bicocca, School of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Italy.
Vincenzo PotaDepartment of Women, Child, General and Surgical Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Sabino ScollettaUnit of Resuscitation, Critical Care, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Carlo Alberto VoltaDepartment of Morphology Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Luigi VetrugnoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Franco CavaliereInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sacro Cuore Catholic University, A. Gemelli Polyclinic, Rome, Italy.
Luigi TritapepeDepartment of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anaesthetic and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Parma · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Udine · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of mechanical ventilation is a key issue in the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and the improvement of surgical outcome. This is especially true in cardiac surgery where the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) increases the risk of lung injury. In the last years a growing number of studies have shown that protective ventilation has led to excellent results. However, the literature in this regard is lacking in cardiac surgery and there are no univocal guidelines in this sense. The aim of this survey was to investigate the actual clinical practice about ventilation techniques used in the Italian cardiac surgery centers.

methodsA questionnaire of 32-item was sent to 69 Italian cardiac surgery centers, 56 of which return a completed form (81.2%). The questionnaire was assembled by three independent researchers and the final version was e-mailed to all members of the SIAARTI (Italian society of anesthesia resuscitation and intensive care medicine) Study Group on Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The answers were collected using a Google Forms sheet. In case of multiple questionnaires returned from the same center (i.e., different physicians from the same center responded) the head of department was asked to give a definite answer. Furthermore, for the 17 centers who reported multiple questionnaires, no large differences were found between the responses of different doctors belonging to the same center (12.3%±4.2% of discordant answers).

resultsIntraoperatively, patients were ventilated with a tidal volume (TV) of 6-8 mL/kg (91.1% of centers), a positive end-expiration pressure of 3-5 cmH

conclusionsThis study shows a significant heterogeneity in ventilatory techniques among the Italian centers during CPB, whereas in the other surgical time the majority of the responding centers adopted a protective mechanical ventilation strategy.

Indexed as

cardiac surgerycardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)Mechanical ventilationpulmonary complicationssurvey

Identifiers

PMID31179101
PMCPMC6531757
OpenAlexW2922960368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.