Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179089›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019

Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Paolo Nardi, Calogera Pisano, Fabio Bertoldo, Sara Rita Vacirca, Monica Greci, Carlo Bassano, Antonio Scafuri, Antonio Pellegrino, Giovanni Ruvolo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of theKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Early Hemodynamics after Aortic Valve Replacement.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo NardiCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Calogera PisanoCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Fabio BertoldoCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sara Rita VacircaCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Monica GreciCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carlo BassanoCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonio ScafuriCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonio PellegrinoCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni RuvoloCardiac Surgery Division, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe retrospectively analysed the short-term outcome of the third-generation St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis.

methodsBetween December 2014 and December 2017, 177 patients (mean age 75.1±6.8 years, 95 males, 82 females) underwent aortic valve replacement with a St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis and were followed up to 27±9 months. Preoperatively 92 patients (52.0%) were in NYHA class III-IV, EuroSCORE II was 3.2%±2.1%.

resultsTrifecta sizes implanted were 19 mm (n=46) (26%), 21 mm (n=69) (39%), 23 mm (n=46) (26%), 25 mm (n=16) (9%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 60 patients (34.0%). Operative mortality was 3.4% (1.7% for isolated aortic valve replacement versus 6.7% for combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting) (P=0.084). The only independent predictor of mortality was the need for the mechanical ventilation greater than 24 hours (P=0.037); recently occurring myocardial infarction was risk factor for mortality at the univariate analysis only (P=0.013). Three-year survival was 84%±6%, freedom from cardiac death 98%±1%, freedom from prosthetic endocarditis 97%±1%. No thromboembolisms or structural valve degeneration were observed. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was absent in 126 patients (71.2%), mild-to-moderate in 32 (18.1%), moderate in 19 (10.7%), severe in no any patient. Follow-up echocardiography showed an average mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients reduction more than 70% in comparison with preoperative value (P<0.0001), and a significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (P<0.0001). Moderate PPM did not negatively affect survival. Concomitant severe coronary artery disease was found as an independent predictor of reduced survival (72%±12% versus 86%±6%) (P=0.015).

conclusionsTrifecta aortic prosthesis seems to provide very favourable clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance. At three years, survival was negatively affected by severe coronary artery disease detected at the time of operation. During short-term follow-up, no early structural valve degeneration was been observed. Due to low incidence of PPM and low peak and mean trans-prosthetic aortic valve gradients, third generation Trifecta aortic prosthesis should be considered as one of the best options in the setting of the aortic valve replacement surgery. However, a long-term follow-up is mandatory to confirm the early promising data.

Indexed as

aortic bio-prosthesisAortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID31179089
PMCPMC6531685
OpenAlexW2921756010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.