Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179018›Full record

ReviewCardiac failure review2019

Remote Management of Heart Failure: An Overview of Telemonitoring Technologies.

Darshan H Brahmbhatt, Martin R Cowie

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiac failure review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05708846 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Observational Study for the Improvement of a Digital Health Platform for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure

TypeobservationalSponsorhumanITcareRan2023 to 2024Enrolled154ConditionsHeart FailureArmsTelemonitoring
NCT05825755 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial for the Validation of Vitalera Platform

TypeinterventionalSponsorhumanITcareRan2024 to 2024Enrolled97ConditionsChronic Patients, Heart FailureArmsvitalera telemonitoring platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Darshan H BrahmbhattImperial College London London, UK.
Martin R CowieImperial College London London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances have enabled increasingly sophisticated attempts to remotely monitor heart failure. This should allow earlier identification of decompensation, better adherence to lifestyle changes and medication and interventions (such as diuretic dosage changes) that reduce the need for hospitalisation. This review discusses telemonitoring approaches in heart failure, and the evidence for their impact. It is not difficult to collect data remotely, but converting more data into better decision-making that improves the outcome of care is challenging. Policy-makers and technology companies are enthusiastic about the potential of digital technologies to transform healthcare and bring expertise to the patient, rather than the other way round, but guideline writers are not yet convinced, due to the lack of consistent findings in randomised trials.

Indexed as

cardiac implantable electronic devicesdisease managementheart failureRemote monitoringtelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID31179018
PMCPMC6545972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.