Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179014›Full record

ReviewCardiac failure review2019

Use of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Older Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Davide Stolfo, Gianluigi Savarese

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiac failure review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mouse models of spontaneous atrial fibrillation.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Second Gaddum Lecture: its origins and outcomes.British journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide StolfoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden.
Gianluigi SavareseDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden.
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste · ITKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients enrolled in randomised clinical trials may not be representative of the real-world population of people with heart failure (HF). Older patients are frequently excluded and this limits the strength of evidence which supports the use of specific HF treatments in this patient group. Lack of evidence together with fear of adverse effects, drug interactions and lower tolerance may lead to the undertreatment of older patients and a less favourable outcome. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but despite the class I recommendation for all patients regardless of age in the guidelines, there are signs that RAAS inhibitors are underused among older patients. Large registry-based studies suggest that RAAS inhibitors may be at least as effective in older patients as younger ones, but these findings need to be confirmed by randomised clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsevidence-based treatmentheart failureolder patientsreduced ejection fractionrenin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31179014
PMCPMC6545993
OpenAlexW2946666221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.