Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31179004›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2019

Randomised Ambulatory Management of Primary Pneumothorax (RAMPP): protocol of an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Rob Hallifax, Magda Laskawiec-Szkonter, Melissa Dobson, Stephen Gerry, Robert F Miller, John E Harvey, Najib Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. How safe is it to discharge home patients with a chest tube in place? A narrative review of the literature.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Advanced medical interventions in pleural disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rob HallifaxDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9467-668X
Magda Laskawiec-SzkonterOxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Melissa DobsonOxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen GerryCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robert F MillerInstitute for Global Health, University College London Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK.
John E HarveyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Najib RahmanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0213-30098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumothorax is a common clinical problem. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) occurs in otherwise fit young patients, but optimal management is not clearly defined and often results in a long hospital stay. Ambulatory treatment options are available, but the existing data on their efficacy are poor. The Randomised Ambulatory Management of Primary Pneumothorax trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing ambulatory management with standard care, specifically designed to safely and effectively reduce hospital stay. Methods and analysis: 236 patients with PSP will be recruited from UK hospitals. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to treatment to either the 'Intervention' arm (ambulatory device; Rocket Pleural Vent) or the 'Control' arm (aspiration ± standard chest drain insertion). Patients will be followed up for a total of 12 months to assess recurrence rates. The primary outcome is total length of stay in hospital (including readmissions) up to 30 days postrandomisation. The secondary outcomes are pain and breathlessness scores, air leak measurement and radiological evidence (on CT scanning) of emphysema-like changes, compared with short-term and long-term outcomes, respectively, and health economic analysis. Ethics and dissemination: The trial has received ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service Committee South-Central Oxford A (15/SC/0240). Trial registration number: ISRCTN79151659.

Indexed as

Research DesignAmbulatory CareHumansPneumothoraxRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicambulatoryoutpatientpleural diseasepneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID31179004
PMCPMC6530507
OpenAlexW2938037247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.