Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178902›Full record

SynthesisNeural plasticity2019

Parent-Infant Interaction during the First Year of Life in Infants at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

F Festante, C Antonelli, O Chorna, G Corsi, A Guzzetta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neural plasticity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07469514 (CIRCLE-CP Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07469514 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CIRCLE-CP Study: Coaching, Learning, Empowerment in Cerebral Palsy - a 6-Week Integrated PT/OT Caregiver "Primer" Bootcamp for Infants Diagnosed With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled32ConditionsCerebral Palsy, Cerebral Palsy (CP), Cerebral Palsy Infantile, InfantArmsCaregiver knowledge, Physical therapy, Occupational Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F FestanteDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-9074
C AntonelliDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.
O ChornaDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2570-1597
G CorsiDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-566X
A GuzzettaDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-0059
Fondazione Stella Maris · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Perinatal adverse events put neonates at high risk for short and long-term disabilities, including cerebral palsy (CP). The most recent guidelines about early intervention in infants with brain damage have emphasized the importance of family involvement from the very first phases of development. Early parent-infant interactions are pivotal in promoting infant cognitive and social developmental trajectories. However, little is known about the extent to which severe adverse perinatal events can affect the quality of early parent-infant interactions. Patients and Methods: We systematically searched five databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) for the publications assessing parent-infant interactions in infants at high neurological risk within 1 year of age. Articles were selected if they involved direct comparison between high-risk populations and healthy controls or low-risk populations, and if quantitative or semiquantitative tools were used to assess the parent-infant interaction. Measures of parent-infant interaction included infant interactive behaviors, parental interactive behaviors, and dyadic interactive patterns. Results: The search yielded 18 publications that met the inclusion criteria. The articles represent a high level of heterogeneity in terms of infant neurological risk, infant age, and tools assessing interactive behaviors. Both infant and maternal behaviors within the investigated interactive exchanges were reported to be compromised, leading to subsequent overall impairment of the dyadic patterns. Conclusion: While the studies reviewed here provide general and important information, the review did not yield a clear picture of early dyadic interactions in high-risk infant populations. Further observational studies are warranted in order to provide a more accurate knowledge of the early dyadic exchanges between infants at high neurological risk and their parents, as they might provide a critical opportunity for early family centered habilitative interventions.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyParent-Child RelationsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31178902
PMCPMC6501141
OpenAlexW2939038870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.