Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178729›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2019

The Effectiveness and Safety of Total Glucosides of Paeony in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhe Feng, Bi-Qing Zhang, Ya-Mei Zhu, Bei-Bei Yu, Ling Fu, Ling-Ling Zhou, Xue-Ping Zhou, Yan Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What can we learn from treatments of oral lichen planus?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Total Glucosides ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhe FengThe First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Bi-Qing ZhangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China.
Ya-Mei ZhuDepartment of Rheumatology, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Bei-Bei YuSchool of Foreign Languages, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Ling FuThe First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Ling-Ling ZhouJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Pharmacology and Safety Evaluation of Material Medica, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Xue-Ping ZhouThe First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yan LuDepartment of Rheumatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of TCM, Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

effectivenessmeta-analysisprimary Sjögren's syndromesafetythe total glucosides of paeony

Identifiers

PMID31178729
PMCPMC6543198
OpenAlexW2945334402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.