ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Perceived Gaze Direction Differentially Affects Discrimination of Facial Emotion, Attention, and Gender - An ERP Study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotion-gaze interaction affects time-to-collision estimates, but not preferred interpersonal distance towards looming faces.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The impact of facial expression and communicative gaze of a humanoid robot on individual Sense of Agency.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Individual differences in gaze-cuing effect are associated with facial emotion recognition and social conformity.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The role of discriminability in face perception: Interference processing of expression, gender, and gaze.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- How facial masks alter the interaction of gaze direction, head orientation, and emotion recognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Emotion, Gender and Gaze Discrimination Tasks do not Differentially Impact the Neural Processing of Angry or Happy Facial Expressions-a Mass Univariate ERP Analysis.Brain topography · 2021Article
- From Gaze Perception to Social Cognition: The Shared-Attention System.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021Review
- Enhanced detection of gaze toward an object: Sociocognitive influences on visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- How ubiquitous is the direct-gaze advantage? Evidence for an averted-gaze advantage in a gaze-discrimination task.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- The N170 event-related potential differentiates congruent and incongruent gaze responses in gaze leading.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- Multiple identity tracking strategies vary by age: An ERP study.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception of eye-gaze is thought to be a key component of our everyday social interactions. While the neural correlates of direct and averted gaze processing have been investigated, there is little consensus about how these gaze directions may be processed differently as a function of the task being performed. In a within-subject design, we examined how perception of direct and averted gaze affected performance on tasks requiring participants to use directly available facial cues to infer the individuals' emotional state (emotion discrimination), direction of attention (attention discrimination) and gender (gender discrimination). Neural activity was recorded throughout the three tasks using EEG, and ERPs time-locked to face onset were analyzed. Participants were most accurate at discriminating emotions with direct gaze faces, but most accurate at discriminating attention with averted gaze faces, while gender discrimination was not affected by gaze direction. At the neural level, direct and averted gaze elicited different patterns of activation depending on the task over frontal sites, from approximately 220-290 ms. More positive amplitudes were seen for direct than averted gaze in the emotion discrimination task. In contrast, more positive amplitudes were seen for averted gaze than for direct gaze in the gender discrimination task. These findings are among the first direct evidence that perceived gaze direction modulates neural activity differently depending on task demands, and that at the behavioral level, specific gaze directions functionally overlap with emotion and attention discrimination, precursors to more elaborated theory of mind processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.