Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178508›Full record

Trial reportInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2019

Kikyo-to vs. Placebo on Sore Throat Associated with Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Naoto Ishimaru, Saori Kinami, Toshio Shimokawa, Yohei Kanzawa

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Revisiting liquorice (Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Pharmacological Effects and Health Benefits ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoto IshimaruDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Akashi Medical Center, Japan.
Saori KinamiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Akashi Medical Center, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaClinical Study Support Centre, Wakayama Medical University, Japan.
Yohei KanzawaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Akashi Medical Center, Japan.
Akashi Medical Center · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Kikyo-to (KKT) is a fixed combination of glycyrrhiza root and platycodon root extracts. It is an herbal medicine traditionally used in Japan for relieving sore throat associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). No controlled studies have yet demonstrated its effect, however. We investigated the efficacy of KKT on sore throat associated with acute URTI. Methods Patients with sore throat who were diagnosed with URTI at the General Medicine Department Office, Akashi Medical Center Hospital, between December 2017 and May 2018 were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups at a 1:1 ratio, with stratification by age and sore throat score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), to receive 2.5 g of either KKT or a placebo. Participants and investigators were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was the change in sore throat score on VAS 10 minutes after KKT administration. Secondary outcomes were the impact of the sore throat on daily life (none, mild, moderate, and severe) at 10 minutes after administration. Results Thirty-five participants were assigned to each group (n=70, total). The difference in the mean change of sore throat score according to VAS within 10 minutes between the two groups was not statistically significant (KKT 14.40 vs. placebo 17.00; p=0.39). The proportion of patients with a moderate or greater impact of their sore throat on their daily life was also not significantly different between the groups (KKT 22.9% vs. placebo 40.0%; p=0.20). Patients reported no side effects. Conclusion KKT did not significantly relieve sore throat associated with acute URTI compared with placebo.

Indexed as

AdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansJapanMaleMedicine, East Asian TraditionalMiddle AgedPharyngitisPhytotherapyPlant PreparationsRespiratory Tract InfectionsTime FactorsPlant Preparationskikyo-tosore throatupper respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

PMID31178508
PMCPMC6761347
OpenAlexW2970491096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.