ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2019
Impact of the Duration of Diabetes Mellitus on the Outcome of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Diabetes and pancreatic cancer: Exploring the two-way traffic.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To assess the impact of the duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who received gemcitabine monotherapy as the standard therapy before the introduction of combination regimens. The treatment outcomes of gemcitabine were compared among three groups classified according to the duration of DM: no DM, short DM (<4 years), and long DM (≥4 years). Results Among 350 patients, 218, 87, and 45 patients were classified into the no DM, short DM, and long DM groups, respectively. In comparison to the no DM group, the univariate hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-2.02; p=0.027] and 1.33 (95% CI, 0.93-1.89; p=0.081), respectively, in the long DM group, and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.85-1.46; p=0.426) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.81-1.40; p=0.678), respectively, in the short DM group; the multivariate-adjusted HRs were 1.33 (95% CI, 0.94-1.89; p=0.103) and 1.37 (95% CI, 0.95-1.98; p=0.095) in the long DM group and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.85-1.47; p=0.410) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.82-1.46; p=0.533) in the short DM group. The survival outcomes of the long DM group tended to remain poorer in analyses using different cutoffs of DM duration as, well as in hospital-specific analyses. Conclusion Long-standing DM may be associated with shorter PFS and OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.