Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178378›Full record

ArticleVaccine2019

Antibody-mediated protection against MERS-CoV in the murine model.

R R C New, B D Moore, W Butcher, R Mahood, M S Lever, S Smither, L O'Brien, S A Weller, M Bayliss, L C D Gibson and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of COVID-19 vaccines: Types, thoughts, and application.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021
    Review
  5. Pathomechanisms, therapeutic targets and potent inhibitors of some beta-coronaviruses from bench-to-bedside.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R R C NewVaxcine (UK) Ltd, c/o London Bioscience Innovation Centre, London, UK; Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London, UK.
B D MoorePure & Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
W ButcherDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
R MahoodDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
M S LeverDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
S SmitherDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
L O'BrienDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
S A WellerDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
M BaylissDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
L C D GibsonScottish Biomedical Drug Discovery, West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow, UK.
C MacleodPure & Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
M BogusVaxcine (UK) Ltd, c/o London Bioscience Innovation Centre, London, UK.
R HarveyNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, UK.
N AlmondNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, UK.
E D WilliamsonDefence Science & Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK. Electronic address: dewilliamson@dstl.gov.uk.
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GBMiddlesex University · GB

Funding

Department of Health 971527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Murine antisera with neutralising activity for the coronavirus causative of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) were induced by immunisation of Balb/c mice with the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the viral Spike protein. The murine antisera induced were fully-neutralising in vitro for two separate clinical strains of the MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV). To test the neutralising capacity of these antisera in vivo, susceptibility to MERS-CoV was induced in naive recipient Balb/c mice by the administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the human DPP4 receptor (Ad5-hDPP4) for MERS-CoV, prior to the passive transfer of the RBD-specific murine antisera to the transduced mice. Subsequent challenge of the recipient transduced mice by the intra-nasal route with a clinical isolate of the MERS-CoV resulted in a significantly reduced viral load in their lungs, compared with transduced mice receiving a negative control antibody. The murine antisera used were derived from mice which had been primed sub-cutaneously with a recombinant fusion of RBD with a human IgG Fc tag (RBD-Fc), adsorbed to calcium phosphate microcrystals and then boosted by the oral route with the same fusion protein in reverse micelles. The data gained indicate that this dual-route vaccination with novel formulations of the RBD-Fc, induced systemic and mucosal anti-viral immunity with demonstrated in vitro and in vivo neutralisation capacity for clinical strains of MERS-CoV.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Disease Models, AnimalFemaleImmunity, MucosalLungMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationViral LoadAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Dpp4 protein, mouseSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusCoronavirusMERSMucosal immunityNeutralising antibodyNovel vaccine formulationRespiratory infectionSystemic immunityVaccination

Identifiers

PMID31178378
PMCPMC7115393
OpenAlexW2955479406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.