Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178315›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Evolution of Ovipositor Length in Drosophila suzukii Is Driven by Enhanced Cell Size Expansion and Anisotropic Tissue Reorganization.

Jack E Green, Matthieu Cavey, Emmanuelle Médina Caturegli, Benoit Aigouy, Nicolas Gompel, Benjamin Prud'homme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A developmental atlas of male terminalia across twelve species ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Resolving between novelty and homology in the rapidly evolving phallus of Drosophila.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jack E GreenAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France.
Matthieu CaveyAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France.
Emmanuelle Médina CaturegliAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France.
Benoit AigouyAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France.
Nicolas GompelLudwig-Maximilians Universität München, Fakultät für Biologie, Biozentrum, Grosshaderner Strasse 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Benjamin Prud'hommeAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IBDM, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France. Electronic address: benjamin.prudhomme@univ-amu.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphological diversity is dominated by variation in body proportion [1], which can be described with scaling relationships and mathematical equations, following the pioneering work of D'Arcy Thompson [2] and Julian Huxley [3]. Yet, the cellular processes underlying divergence in size and shape of morphological traits between species remain largely unknown [4-8]. Here, we compare the ovipositors of two related species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. suzukii. D. suzukii has switched its egg-laying niche from rotting to ripe fruit [9]. Along with this shift, the D. suzukii ovipositor has undergone a significant change in size and shape [10]. Using an allometric approach, we find that, while adult ovipositor width has hardly changed between the species, D. suzukii ovipositor length is almost double that of D. melanogaster. We show that this difference mostly arises in a 6-h time window during pupal development. We observe that the developing ovipositors of the two species comprise an almost identical number of cells, with a similar profile of cell shapes and orientations. After cell division stops, we find that the ovipositor area continues to grow in both species through the isotropic expansion of cell apical area and the anisotropic cellular reorganization of the tissue. Remarkably, we find that the lengthening of the D. suzukii ovipositor compared to that of D. melanogaster results from the combination of the accelerated expansion of apical cell size and the enhanced anisotropic rearrangement of cells in the tissue. Therefore, the quantitative fine-tuning of morphogenetic processes can drive evolutionary changes in organ size and shape.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell EnlargementOvipositionAnimalsDrosophilaFemalecell apical areaDrosophila suzukiimorphological scalingovipositortissue anisotropy

Identifiers

PMID31178315
PMCPMC6584362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.