Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178314›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Mycorrhizal Fungi Respond to Resource Inequality by Moving Phosphorus from Rich to Poor Patches across Networks.

Matthew D Whiteside, Gijsbert D A Werner, Victor E A Caldas, Anouk Van't Padje, Simon E Dupin, Bram Elbers, Milenka Bakker, Gregory A K Wyatt, Malin Klein, Mark A Hink and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Studying adaptation at the invisible scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Carbon-phosphorus exchange rate constrains density-speed trade-off in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthew D WhitesideDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gijsbert D A WernerDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK; Balliol College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BJ, UK.
Victor E A CaldasDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AMOLF Institute, Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anouk Van't PadjeDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Simon E DupinDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bram ElbersDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Milenka BakkerDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gregory A K WyattDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
Malin KleinDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark A HinkSection of Molecular Cytology and van Leeuwenhoek Centre for Advanced Microscopy, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marten PostmaSection of Molecular Cytology and van Leeuwenhoek Centre for Advanced Microscopy, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bapu VaitlaHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ronald NoëFaculté Psychologie, Université de Strasbourg, 12 Rue Goethe, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Thomas S ShimizuAMOLF Institute, Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stuart A WestDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
E Toby KiersDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: toby.kiers@vu.nl.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NLHarvard University · USInstitute for Atomic and Molecular Physics · NLUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

European Research Council 335542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world's ecosystems are characterized by an unequal distribution of resources [1]. Trade partnerships between organisms of different species-mutualisms-can help individuals cope with such resource inequality [2-4]. Trade allows individuals to exchange commodities they can provide at low cost for resources that are otherwise impossible or more difficult to access [5, 6]. However, as resources become increasingly patchy in time or space, it is unknown how organisms alter their trading strategies [7, 8]. Here, we show how a symbiotic fungus mediates trade with a host root in response to different levels of resource inequality across its network. We developed a quantum-dot-tracking technique to quantify phosphorus-trading strategies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi simultaneously exposed to rich and poor resource patches. By following fluorescent nanoparticles of different colors across fungal networks, we determined where phosphorus was hoarded, relocated, and transferred to plant hosts. We found that increasing exposure to inequality stimulated trade. Fungi responded to high resource variation by (1) increasing the total amount of phosphorus distributed to host roots, (2) decreasing allocation to storage, and (3) differentially moving resources within the network from rich to poor patches. Using single-particle tracking and high-resolution video, we show how dynamic resource movement may help the fungus capitalize on value differences across the trade network, physically moving resources to areas of high demand to gain better returns. Such translocation strategies can help symbiotic organisms cope with exposure to resource inequality.

Indexed as

SymbiosisDaucus carotaGlomeromycotaMycorrhizaeNutrientsPhosphorusPlant RootsQuantum DotsNutrientsPhosphorusarbuscular mycorrhizaebiological marketsconflictcooperationeconomicshoardinginequalitymutualismquantum dotssymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID31178314
PMCPMC6584331
OpenAlexW2948356239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.