Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31178289›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2019

Efficacy of live oral rotavirus vaccines by duration of follow-up: a meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.

Andrew Clark, Kevin van Zandvoort, Stefan Flasche, Colin Sanderson, Julie Bines, Jacqueline Tate, Umesh Parashar, Mark Jit

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Immunostimulatory Pickering emulsion for oral vaccine delivery.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew ClarkLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: andrew.clark@lshtm.ac.uk.
Kevin van ZandvoortLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stefan FlascheLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Colin SandersonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Julie BinesMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jacqueline TateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Umesh ParasharCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark JitLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe duration of protection offered by rotavirus vaccines varies across the world, and this variation is important to understanding and predicting the effects of the vaccines. There is now a large body of evidence on the efficacy of live oral rotavirus vaccines in different settings, but these data have never been synthesised to obtain robust estimates of efficacy by duration of follow-up. Our aim is to estimate the efficacy of live oral rotavirus vaccines at each point during follow-up and by mortality stratum.

methodsIn our meta-regression study, we identified all randomised controlled trials of rotavirus vaccines published until April 4, 2018, using the results of a Cochrane systematic review, and cross checked these studies against those identified by another systematic review. We excluded trials that were based on special populations, trials without an infant schedule, and trials without clear reporting of numbers of enrolled infants and events in different periods of follow-up. For all reported periods of follow-up, we extracted the mean duration of follow-up (time since administration of the final dose of rotavirus vaccination), the number of enrolled infants, and case counts for rotavirus-positive severe gastroenteritis in both non-vaccinated and vaccinated groups. We used a Bayesian hierarchical Poisson meta-regression model to estimate the pooled cumulative vaccine efficacy (VE) and its waning with time for three mortality strata. We then converted these VE estimates into instantaneous VE (iVE).

findingsIn settings with low mortality (15 observations), iVE pooled for infant schedules of Rotarix and RotaTeq was 98% (95% credibility interval 93-100) 2 weeks following the final dose of vaccination and 94% (87-98) after 12 months. In medium-mortality settings (11 observations), equivalent estimates were 82% (74-92) after 2 weeks and 77% (67-84) after 12 months. In settings with high mortality (24 observations), there were five different vaccines with observation points for infant schedules. The pooled iVE was 66% (48-81) after 2 weeks of follow-up and 44% (27-59) after 12 months.

interpretationRotavirus vaccine efficacy is lower and wanes more rapidly in high-mortality settings than in low-mortality settings, but the earlier peak age of disease in high-mortality settings means that live oral rotavirus vaccines are still likely to provide substantial benefit.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Administration, OralRotavirus InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastroenteritisHumansInfantMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRotavirusRotavirus VaccinesSeverity of Illness IndexVaccinationRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31178289
PMCPMC6595176
OpenAlexW2948888508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.