Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31177642›Full record

ArticleHLA2019

Towards uniformity in the definition of acceptable mismatches for highly sensitized patients.

Mian Chen, Yvonne Zoet, Dave Roelen, Jaume Martorell, Derek Middleton, Antonij Slavcev, Aliki Iniotaki, Frans Claas, Susan Fuggle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HLA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mian ChenOxford Transplant Centre, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford University Hospitals, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-4861
Yvonne ZoetEurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dave RoelenDepartment of Immunohematology and Blood transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jaume MartorellHospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Derek MiddletonTransplant Immunology Laboratory, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Antonij SlavcevDepartment of Immunogenetics, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Aliki IniotakiNational Tissue Typing Center, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece.
Frans ClaasEurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Susan FuggleOxford Transplant Centre, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford University Hospitals, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Eurotransplant (The Eurotransplant International Foundation) acceptable mismatch programme has been shown to be a successful tool to enhance transplantation of highly sensitized patients(HSPs). However, patients with rare HLA phenotypes in relation to the Eurotransplant donor population remain on the waiting list. EUROSTAM is an European Union funded project to explore the feasibility of a Europe-wide acceptable mismatch programme enabling transplantation of HSPs with rare HLA phenotypes within their own organ exchange organization. The present study, which forms part of the EUROSTAM project, assesses the differences in the practices of the laboratories in different countries with respect to their HLA antibody profiling and risk adverseness. In the serum exchange exercises of 18 samples, a high level of variability has been shown in both assays and interpretation of results. In the data exchange exercise when all participants were given the same Luminex raw data for analysis, a high degree of consensus was reached where the median fluorescent intensity values of beads were <500 and >2000 for standard single antigen bead assays, or <500 and >5000 for assignment of acceptable mismatches. The risk adverseness analysis has showed distinct patterns of attitudes towards the perceived risks based on HLA antibody assay results, most probably influenced by the local protocols of the clinical transplant programme of each laboratory. In order to ensure fairness and maintain consistencies of organ exchange among partner transplant centres, a centralized facility will be instrumental for a uniform definition of acceptable mismatches.

Indexed as

Histocompatibility TestingImmunizationConsensusFluorescenceHumansSerumacceptable mismatchhighly sensitizedHLA antibodykidney transplantLuminexmulticentre studies

Identifiers

PMID31177642
PMCPMC6771471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.