ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Automatic annotation of surgical activities using virtual reality environments.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of annotation for surgical process model analysis in minimally invasive surgery based on video.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Review of automated performance metrics to assess surgical technical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Assessment of Automated Identification of Phases in Videos of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Deep Learning Techniques.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2024Article
- Automatic Annotations by Augmented Reality-Enabled Laparoscopic Surgery.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnnotation of surgical activities becomes increasingly important for many recent applications such as surgical workflow analysis, surgical situation awareness, and the design of the operating room of the future, especially to train machine learning methods in order to develop intelligent assistance. Currently, annotation is mostly performed by observers with medical background and is incredibly costly and time-consuming, creating a major bottleneck for the above-mentioned technologies. In this paper, we propose a way to eliminate, or at least limit, the human intervention in the annotation process.
methodsMeaningful information about interaction between objects is inherently available in virtual reality environments. We propose a strategy to convert automatically this information into annotations in order to provide as output individual surgical process models. VALIDATION: We implemented our approach through a peg-transfer task simulator and compared it to manual annotations. To assess the impact of our contribution, we studied both intra- and inter-observer variability. RESULTS AND
conclusionIn average, manual annotations took more than 12 min for 1 min of video to achieve low-level physical activity annotation, whereas automatic annotation is achieved in less than a second for the same video period. We also demonstrated that manual annotation introduced mistakes as well as intra- and inter-observer variability that our method is able to suppress due to the high precision and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31177422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.