ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2019
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Reactive Response Inhibition in Healthy Volunteers.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of variance in tDCS effects on response inhibition.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on modulating executive functions in healthy populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke: a Systematic Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS On Inhibitory Control in Healthy Adults: Exploring Trait Moderation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Effect of medication therapy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on depression and response inhibition of patients with bipolar disorder type I: a clinical trial.BMC psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Time Dependent Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Cerebello-cortical Connectivity Networks in Young Adults.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation Reveals the Causal Role of the Cerebellum in Temporal Prediction.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
- Neural Correlates of Delay Discounting in the Light of Brain Imaging and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: What We Know and What Is Missed.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Case report: the effects of cerebellar tDCS in bilingual post-stroke aphasia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Superior temporal gyrus and cerebellar loops predict nonsuicidal self-injury in major depressive disorder patients by multimodal neuroimaging.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Abnormal spontaneous neural activity in hippocampal-cortical system of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and its potential for diagnosis and prediction of early treatment response.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Polarity-Specific Nature of Single-Session High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex on Motor and Non-motor Task Performance.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2021Article
- Cerebellar contributions to cognition in corticobasal syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy.Brain communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Involvement of the cerebellum to non-motor related aspects of behavior is becoming increasingly clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the cerebellum in reactive and proactive behavioral control and interference. In a double-blind controlled within-subject design, 26 healthy volunteers underwent real and sham cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) while performing a go/no-go task and a delay discounting task. Results showed that the number of go/no-go commission errors was significantly lower during real as compared with sham cerebellar tDCS. No effects of tDCS were observed on delay discounting. Our findings provide further behavioral support for the involvement of the cerebellum in fast neural processes associated with response inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.