Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31176833›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Dissociating the functions of superior and inferior parts of the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex during visual word and object processing.

Philipp Ludersdorfer, Cathy J Price, Keith J Kawabata Duncan, Kristina DeDuck, Nicholas H Neufeld, Mohamed L Seghier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Philipp LudersdorferWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: c.j.price@ucl.ac.uk.
Keith J Kawabata DuncanWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kristina DeDuckWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Nicholas H NeufeldWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mohamed L SeghierWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Emirates College for Advanced Education (ECAE), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
University College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBMcGill University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During word and object recognition, extensive activation has consistently been observed in the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex (vOT), focused around the occipito-temporal sulcus (OTs). Previous studies have shown that there is a hierarchy of responses from posterior to anterior vOT regions (along the y-axis) that corresponds with increasing levels of recognition - from perceptual to semantic processing, respectively. In contrast, the functional differences between superior and inferior vOT responses (i.e. along the z-axis) have not yet been elucidated. To investigate, we conducted an extensive review of the literature and found that peak activation for reading varies by more than 1 cm in the z-axis. In addition, we investigated functional differences between superior and inferior parts of left vOT by analysing functional MRI data from 58 neurologically normal skilled readers performing 8 different visual processing tasks. We found that group activation in superior vOT was significantly more sensitive than inferior vOT to the type of task, with more superior vOT activation when participants were matching visual stimuli for their semantic or perceptual content than producing speech to the same stimuli. This functional difference along the z-axis was compared to existing boundaries between cytoarchitectonic areas around the OTs. In addition, using dynamic causal modelling, we show that connectivity from superior vOT to anterior vOT increased with semantic content during matching tasks but not during speaking tasks whereas connectivity from inferior vOT to anterior vOT was sensitive to semantic content for matching and speaking tasks. The finding of a functional dissociation between superior and inferior parts of vOT has implications for predicting deficits and response to rehabilitation for patients with partial damage to vOT following stroke or neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Brain MappingReadingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOccipital LobePattern Recognition, VisualTemporal LobeYoung AdultConnectivityfMRIFusiform gyrusOccipito-temporal sulcusReading and object recognition

Identifiers

PMID31176833
PMCPMC6693527
OpenAlexW2951519578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.