Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31176623›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2020

Wnt-pathway Activating Mutations Are Associated with Resistance to First-line Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Wei Fu, Hao Wang, Nooshin Mirkheshti, Fahad Qazi, Fabiola A S Lima, Farah Shaukat, Michael A Carducci, Samuel R Denmeade, Channing J Paller and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro Isaacsson VelhoJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Wei FuJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hao WangJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nooshin MirkheshtiMedStar Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Fahad QaziMedStar Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Fabiola A S LimaHospital Sirio Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Farah ShaukatJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael A CarducciJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Samuel R DenmeadeJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Channing J PallerJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark C MarkowskiJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Catherine H MarshallJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mario A EisenbergerJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: eantona1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USMedStar Health · USHospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWnt signaling is a cellular pathway involved in embryogenesis, development, and neoplasia. Wnt-pathway activation may accelerate prostate cancer androgen-independent growth and mediate antiandrogen resistance. Since 10-20% of advanced prostate cancers harbor Wnt-activating mutations, we aimed to characterize the clinical features and response to novel antiandrogens in such patients.

objectiveTo determine whether men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who harbor Wnt-pathway mutations have poorer responses to first-line novel hormonal therapies: abiraterone/enzalutamide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsPatients with mCRPC who received first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide were retrospectively evaluated. Using tumor DNA analyses, we queried for activating mutations in CTNNB1 or inactivating mutations in APC or RNF43, all of which are predicted to stimulate Wnt signaling. Presence or absence of at least one Wnt-activating alteration was correlated with clinical-pathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, overall survival (OS), and PSA response were measured. Cox regression models were used to test associations between Wnt status and clinical-pathologic outcomes; Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to compare time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 137 patients evaluated, 11% (n=15) had tumor DNA analysis showing at least one Wnt-stimulating alteration. Patients with Wnt-activating mutations had numerically fewer T3/T4 tumors than Wnt wild-type patients (31% vs 51%), but were otherwise generally balanced. Median time to PSA progression on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide was shorter in Wnt-activated patients (6.5 vs 9.6mo, hazard ratio [HR] 2.34, p=0.003), as was OS (23.6 vs 27.7mo, HR 2.28, p=0.01). PSA responses were numerically worse in Wnt-activated patients (53% vs 75%, p=0.12). Presence of Wnt-activating alterations (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.33, p=0.007) and use of previous chemotherapy (aHR 1.83, p=0.004) were both independently associated with increased hazard of progression.

conclusionsPatients with somatic Wnt-pathway activating mutations have worse outcomes to first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide than Wnt wild-type patients. Our data suggest that additional genomically informed therapies are needed for this relevant subset of mCRPC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we retrospectively examined outcomes of metastatic prostate cancer patients with or without Wnt-pathway mutations who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for the first time, in order to examine whether these mutations affect the prognosis. Our study suggested that patients who have Wnt-pathway activating mutations derived less benefit from abiraterone and enzalutamide when compared to patients without these mutations. We conclude that Wnt-pathway mutations might decrease the effectiveness of abiraterone and enzalutamide, and we propose that the Wnt pathway might be a good therapeutic target for these patients, in order to potentially reverse or prolong resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in men with Wnt mutations.

Indexed as

MutationAgedAndrostenesBenzamidesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWnt Signaling PathwayabirateroneAndrostenesBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinAbirateroneAntiandrogensCancerEnzalutamideProstateWnt

Identifiers

PMID31176623
PMCPMC6893106
OpenAlexW2948919866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.